Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:21:05.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a Social Work Service for Self-Poisoning Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. S. Gibbons ,
J. Butler ,
P. Urwin  and
J. L. Gibbons
J. S. Gibbons
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Administration, University of Southampton, SO9 5NH
J. Butler
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO9 5NH
P. Urwin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO9 5NH
J. L. Gibbons
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO9 5NH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four hundred patients aged at least 17 who came to Casualty in one year after deliberately poisoning themselves were randomly assigned between an Experimental social work service (task-centred casework) and a Control (Routine) follow-up service. 139 patients were excluded from the trial, most of whom were already in continuing psychiatric treatment. After one year there was no difference in the proportions of E and C patients who repeated self-poisoning (about 14 per cent), but significantly more of the excluded group had repeated (36 per cent). A random half of the trial patients were re-interviewed four months after admission. Both E and C groups had improved to a significant extent on measures of depressed mood and of social problems. E patients showed more change in social problems and were more satisfied with the service they had received.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 133 , Issue 2 , August 1978 , pp. 111 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, J. & zCoppen, A. (1976) A comparison between the Hamilton Rating Scale and the Beck Inventory in the measurement of depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 486–9.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H. & Mendelson, M. (1961) An Inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buglass, D. & Horton, J. (1974) A scale for predicting subsequent suicidal behaviour. British Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 573–8.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, N. L., Hicks, R. C. & Kreitman, N. (1973) Evaluation of an aftercare service for parasuicide (attempted suicide) patients. Social Psychiatry, 8, 67–81.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, R. (1975) Evaluation of suicide-prevention after attempted suicide. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Supplement 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S. & Bagley, C. (1971) Effect of psychiatric intervention in attempted suicide: a controlled study. British Medical Journal, i, 310–12.Google Scholar
Hankoff, L. D. (1976) Categories of attempted suicide: a longitudinal study. American Journal of Public Health, 66, 558–63.Google Scholar
Jones, D. I. R. (1977) Self-poisoning with drugs: the past 20 years in Sheffield. British Medical Journal, i, 28–9.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (1972) Efficacy of a regional poisoning treatment centre in preventing further suicidal behaviour. British Medical Journal, iv, 255–7.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. & Goldman, E. (1965) Validation of an inventory for measuring depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 240–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oast, S. P. & Zitrin, A. (1975) A public health approach to suicide prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 65, 144–7.Google Scholar
Reid, W. & Epstein, L. (1972) Task-Centered Casework, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, M. A., Bohnert, M., Beck, A. T. & Marcus, D. (1971) Relation of depression of attempted suicide and seriousness of intent. Archives of General Psychiatry, 25, 573–6.Google Scholar
Ternansen, P. E. & Bywater, C. (1975) S.A.F.E.R.: A follow-up service for attempted suicide in Vancouver. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 20, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.