Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T08:57:45.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy and safety of cholinergic modulators in patients with schizophrenia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2025

Amiya Shaju
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
Archana Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
Debadatta Mohapatra
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
Anand Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
Rituparna Maiti*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
*
Correspondence: Rituparna Maiti. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

One-third of schizophrenia patients show a lack of response to conventional antipsychotic drugs because of adverse effects and limited efficacy. Emerging treatments target muscarinic and nicotinic receptors, leveraging cholinergic dysfunction implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cholinergic modulators in schizophrenia.

Methods

Reviewers extracted data from clinical trials sourced via MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane databases and registries. Quality was assessed with a risk-of-bias tool and a random-effects model estimated effect size. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed as needed, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.

Results

A total of 30 randomised controlled trials (3128 participants) tested cholinergic modulators as monotherapy or adjunct therapy. They did not significantly improve Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (standardised mean difference (SMD): −0.38; 95% CI: −0.93, 0.18; moderate certainty evidence) but did improve negative symptom scores (SMD: −0.42; 95% CI: −0.59, −0.25; moderate certainty evidence). Muscarinic agonists improved total (SMD: −0.57; 95% CI: −0.72, −0.42), positive (SMD: −0.58; 95% CI: −0.73, −0.43) and negative symptoms of PANSS (SMD: −0.40; 95% CI: −0.59, −0.21), as well as Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S) (SMD: −0.48; 95% CI: −0.65, −0.31). Nicotinic agonists aided negative symptoms (SMD: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.47, −0.09) and CGI-S (SMD: −1.31; 95% CI: −2.38, −0.24). Adverse events were higher (odds ratio: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.56) in the experimental group.

Conclusion

Cholinergic modulators significantly improve negative symptoms, with muscarinic agonists showing improvement across symptom domains and severity, without notable differences in adverse effects from placebo. Most studies were at low bias risk; evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate.

Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Psychological Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th ed. APA, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.Google Scholar
Goldner, EM, Hsu, L, Waraich, P, Somers, JM. Prevalence and incidence studies of schizophrenic disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry 2002; 47: 833–43.Google ScholarPubMed
GBD 2017 Disease and injury incidence and prevalance collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392: 1789–858.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, RA, Krystal, JH, Howes, OD. Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment. World Psychiatry 2020; 19: 1533.Google Scholar
Elkis, H. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2007; 30: 511–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Cipriani, A, Agunbiade, A, Salanti, G. Muscarinic drug shows efficacy in schizophrenia but much is left to be discovered. Lancet 2024; 403: 120–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Raedler, TJ, Bymaster, FP, Tandon, R, Copolov, D, Dean, B. Towards a muscarinic hypothesis of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2007; 12: 232–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, R, Lamnisos, D, Giannakou, K. Anticholinergic burden and cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic literature review. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12: 779607.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeon, J, Dencker, D, Wörtwein, G, Woldbye, DPD, Cui, Y, Davis, AA, et al. A subpopulation of neuronal M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors plays a critical role in modulating dopamine-dependent behaviors. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 2396–405.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, RA, Weber, LAE, Nour, MM, Cragg, SJ, McGuire, PM. Psychosis as a disorder of muscarinic signalling: psychopathology and pharmacology. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11: 554–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Vaidya, S, Guerin, AA, Walker, LC, Lawrence, AJ. Clinical effectiveness of muscarinic receptor-targeted interventions in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review. CNS Drugs 2022; 36: 1171–206.Google ScholarPubMed
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves drug with new mechanism of action for treatment of schizophrenia. FDA, 2024 (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-drug-new-mechanism-action-treatment-schizophrenia).Google Scholar
Kanniah, G, Kumar, R. A selective literature review exploring the role of the nicotinic system in schizophrenia. Gen Psychiatr 2023; 36: e100756.Google ScholarPubMed
Shekhar, A, Potter, WZ, Lightfoot, J, Lienemann, J, Dubé, S, Mallinckrodt, C, et al. Selective muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline as a novel treatment approach for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 1033–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kidambi, N, Elsayed, OH, El-Mallakh, RS. Xanomeline-trospium and muscarinic involvement in schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2023; 19: 1145–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, SI, Schwartz, BL, Schooler, NR, Brown, CH, Rosse, RB, Rosse, SM. Targeting alpha-7 nicotinic neurotransmission in schizophrenia: a novel agonist strategy. Schizophr Res 2013; 148: 138–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, J, Kour, K, Jayaram, MB. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1: CD007967.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, CR, Kangas, BD, Jutkiewicz, EM, Bergman, J, Coop, A. Drug design targeting the muscarinic receptors and the implications in central nervous system disorders. Biomedicines 2022; 10(2): 398.Google ScholarPubMed
Moran, SP, Maksymetz, J, Conn, PJ. Targeting muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2019; 40: 1006–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Shamseer, L, Clarke, M, Ghersi, D, Liberati, A, Petticrew, M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 1.Google ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, PRISMA-P Group, . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.Google ScholarPubMed
Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.Google ScholarPubMed
Higgins, JPT, Chandler, J, Cumpston, M, Li, T, Page, MJ, Welch, VA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5. Cochrane, 2024.Google Scholar
Balduzzi, S, Rucker, G, Schwarzer, G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health 2019; 22: 153–60.Google Scholar
Sterne, JAC, Savovic, J, Page, MJ, Elbers, RG, Blencowe, NS, Boutron, I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898.Google ScholarPubMed
Baujat, B, Mahe, C, Pignon, JP, Hill, C. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2641–52.Google ScholarPubMed
GRADEpro. GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. McMaster University and Evidence Prime, 2024.Google Scholar
Kaul, I, Sawchak, S, Walling, DP, Tamminga, CA, Breier, A, Zhu, H, et al. Efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium chloride in schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2024; 81: 749–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaul, I, Sawchak, S, Correll, CU, Kakar, R, Breier, A, Zhu, H, et al. Efficacy and safety of the muscarinic receptor agonist KarXT (xanomeline-trospium) in schizophrenia (EMERGENT-2) in the USA: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose phase 3 trial. Lancet 2024; 403: 160–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Krystal, JH, Kane, JM, Correll, CU, Walling, DP, Leoni, M, Duvvuri, S, et al. Emraclidine, a novel positive allosteric modulator of cholinergic M4 receptors, for the treatment of schizophrenia: a two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b trial. Lancet 2022; 400: 2210–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Brannan, SK, Sawchak, S, Miller, AC, Lieberman, JA, Paul, SM, Breier, A. Muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonist and peripheral antagonist for schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 717–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Kantrowitz, JT, Javitt, DC, Freedman, R, Sehatpour, P, Kegeles, LS, Carlson, M, et al. Double blind, two dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over clinical trial of the positive allosteric modulator at the alpha7 nicotinic cholinergic receptor AVL-3288 in schizophrenia patients. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020; 45: 1339–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Freedman, R, Olincy, A, Buchanan, RW, Harris, JG, Gold, JM, Johnson, L, et al. Initial phase 2 trial of a nicotinic agonist in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 1040–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Kem, WR, Olincy, A, Johnson, L, Harris, J, Wagner, BD, Buchanan, RW, et al. Pharmacokinetic limitations on effects of an alpha7-nicotinic receptor agonist in schizophrenia: randomized trial with an extended-release formulation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018; 43: 583–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Keefe, RS, Malhotra, AK, Meltzer, HY, Kane, JM, Buchanan, RW, Murthy, A, et al. Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: significant placebo/practice effects in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 1217–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Fagerlund, B, Soholm, B, Fink-Jensen, A, Lublin, H, Glenthoj, BY. Effects of donepezil adjunctive treatment to ziprasidone on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2007; 30: 312.Google ScholarPubMed
Risch, SC, Horner, MD, McGurk, SR, Palecko, S, Markowitz, JS, Nahas, Z, et al. Double-blind donepezil-placebo crossover augmentation study of atypical antipsychotics in chronic, stable schizophrenia: a pilot study. Schizophr Res 2007; 93: 131–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Tugal, O, Yazici, KM, Anil Yagcioglu, AE, Gogus, A. A double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over trial of adjunctive donepezil for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 117–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Dyer, MA, Freudenreich, O, Culhane, MA, Pachas, GN, Deckersbach, T, Murphy, E, et al. High-dose galantamine augmentation inferior to placebo on attention, inhibitory control and working memory performance in nonsmokers with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2008; 102: 8895.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindenmayer, JP, Khan, A. Galantamine augmentation of long-acting injectable risperidone for cognitive impairments in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2011; 125: 267–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, RW, Kelly, DL, Weiner, E, Gold, JM, Strauss, GP, Koola, MM, et al. A randomized clinical trial of oxytocin or galantamine for the treatment of negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 37: 394400.Google ScholarPubMed
Conley, RR, Boggs, DL, Kelly, DL, McMahon, RP, Dickinson, D, Feldman, S, et al. The effects of galantamine on psychopathology in chronic stable schizophrenia. Clin Neuropharmacol 2009; 32: 6974.Google ScholarPubMed
Erickson, SK, Schwarzkopf, SB, Palumbo, D, Badgley-Fleeman, J, Smirnow, AM, Light, GA. Efficacy and tolerability of low-dose donepezil in schizophrenia. Clin Neuropharmacol 2005; 28: 179–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, JI, Adler, DN, Howanitz, E, Harvey, PD, Brenner, G, Temporini, H, et al. A double blind placebo controlled trial of donepezil adjunctive treatment to risperidone for the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51: 349–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, BJ, Lee, JG, Kim, YH. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil as an adjunct to haloperidol for treating cognitive impairments in patients with chronic schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol 2007; 21: 421–7.Google Scholar
Nahas, Z, George, MS, Horner, MD, Markowitz, JS, Li, X, Lorberbaum, JP, et al. Augmenting atypical antipsychotics with a cognitive enhancer (donepezil) improves regional brain activity in schizophrenia patients: a pilot double-blind placebo controlled BOLD fMRI study. Neurocase 2003; 9: 274–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Umbricht, D, Keefe, RS, Murray, S, Lowe, DA, Porter, R, Garibaldi, G, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study investigating the nicotinic alpha7 agonist, RG3487, for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014; 39: 1568–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Walling, D, Marder, SR, Kane, J, Fleischhacker, WW, Keefe, RS, Hosford, DA, et al. Phase 2 trial of an alpha-7 nicotinic receptor agonist (TC-5619) in negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2016; 42: 335–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, RC, Amiaz, R, Si, TM, Maayan, L, Jin, H, Boules, S, et al. Varenicline effects on smoking, cognition, and psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized trial. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0143490.Google ScholarPubMed
Haig, G, Wang, D, Othman, AA, Zhao, J. The alpha7 nicotinic agonist ABT-126 in the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia in nonsmokers: results from a randomized controlled phase 2b study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016; 41: 2893–902.Google ScholarPubMed
Haig, GM, Bain, EE, Robieson, WZ, Baker, JD, Othman, AA. A randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of ABT-126, a selective alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, in the treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173: 827–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Haig, GM, Wang, D, Zhao, J, Othman, AA, Bain, EE. Efficacy and safety of the alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 in the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: results from a phase 2b randomized controlled study in smokers. J Clin Psychiatry 2018; 79: 16m11162.Google ScholarPubMed
Shiina, A, Shirayama, Y, Niitsu, T, Hashimoto, T, Yoshida, T, Hasegawa, T, et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tropisetron in patients with schizophrenia. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2010; 9: 27.Google ScholarPubMed
Noroozian, M, Ghasemi, S, Hosseini, SM, Modabbernia, A, Khodaie-Ardakani, MR, Mirshafiee, O, et al. A placebo-controlled study of tropisetron added to risperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in chronic and stable schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013; 228: 595602.Google ScholarPubMed
Keefe, RS, Meltzer, HA, Dgetluck, N, Gawryl, M, Koenig, G, Moebius, HJ, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of encenicline, an alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, as a treatment for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015; 40: 3053–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Smucny, J, Tregellas, JR. Targeting neuronal dysfunction in schizophrenia with nicotine: Evidence from neurophysiology to neuroimaging. J Psychopharmacol 2017; 31: 801–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Shaju et al. supplementary material

Shaju et al. supplementary material
Download Shaju et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1 MB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.