Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9f2xs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T02:22:53.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Early Life Experiences and Personality on the Reporting of Psychosocial Distress in General Practice: A Preliminary Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Scott Weich ,
Glyn Lewis  and
Anthony Mann
Scott Weich*
Affiliation:
Jointly with London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT
Glyn Lewis
Affiliation:
Jointly with London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT
Anthony Mann
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
*
Dr S. Weich, Section of Epidemiology and General Practice, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

About 25% of primary care attenders are ‘somatic presenters’; individuals consulting for physically-attributed somatic symptoms in the presence of psychiatric morbidity. We tested the hypothesis that somatic presenters differed from psychological presenters on measures of personality and childhood experience.

Method

Case-control study of ‘psychological presenters’ and ‘somatic presenters’.

Results

Psychological presenters reported significantly greater insecurity in intimate relationships, and recalled their fathers as significantly less caring and more over-protective, than somatic presenters. These differences remained after adjusting for differences in the severity and duration of psychiatric symptoms.

Conclusions

Personality and childhood experiences may be associated with specific types of adult illness behaviour, independent of associations with the prevalence of psychiatric disorder.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 168 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 116 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, B. & Merskey, H. (1982) Parental representations of hypochondriacal patients from a psychiatric hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, M., Billington, R. & Becker, B. (1986) A scale for the assessment of object relations: Reliability, validity and factorial invariance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 733–741.Google Scholar
Bridges, K., Goldberg, D., Evans, B., et al (1991) Determinants of somatisation in primary care. Psychological Medicine, 21, 473–483.Google Scholar
Craig, T. K. J., Boardman, A. P., Mills, K., et al (1993) The South London somatisation study. I: Longitudinal course and the influence of early life experiences. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frasure-Smith, N., Lesperance, F. & Talajic, M. (1993) Depression following myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 1819–1825.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. & Huxley, P. (1992) Common Mental Disorders. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988) A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER–Nelson.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Kessler, R. C., Neale, M. C., et al (1993) The prediction of major depression in women: toward an integrated etiologic model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1139–1148.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., Pelosi, A. J., Araya, R., et al (1992) Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardised assessment for use by lay interviewers. Psychological Medicine, 22, 465–486.Google Scholar
Parker, G. & Lipscombe, P. (1980) The relevance of early parental experiences to adult dependency, hypochondriasis and utilisation of primary physicians. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 53, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weich, S., Lewis, G., Donmall, R., et al (1995) Somatic presentation of psychiatric morbidity in general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 45, 143–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.