Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:00:06.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deliberate Self-harm and Predictors of Out-patient Attendance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

G. O'Brien ,
A. R. Holton ,
K. Hurren ,
L. Watt  and
F. Hassanyeh
G. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Nottingham University
A. R. Holton
Affiliation:
Nottingham University
K. Hurren
Affiliation:
Nottingham University
L. Watt
Affiliation:
Royal Victoria Infirmary
F. Hassanyeh*
Affiliation:
Royal Victoria Infirmary
*
∗Department of Psychiatry, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kreitman (1979) reported that up to one-half of patients given out-patient appointments one week after an episode of deliberate self-harm (DSH) fail to attend, and gave a number of possible explanations for this. Firstly, parasuicide is often the result of a crisis which may have resolved (albeit temporarily) by the end of a further week. Secondly, someone in a state of heightened tension may find one week too long to wait, and may resort to other strategies to deal with his problems. Thirdly, many parasuicides may find a psychiatric label unacceptable in the context of their problems, and fourthly, an appoint ment made for a fixed day and a fixed hour may not fit the need for immediate action which the subjects subculture had inculcated in him as a habit pattern. Morgan et al (1976) reported that up to 40% of their DSH patients either did not attend any appointment or failed to complete their treatment. Two possible explanations for this were that they either felt that they did not need psychiatric treatment, or else believed that psychiatric treatment was not an answer to their problems. Kessel and Lee (1962), probably in line with much psychiatric practice, did not give a follow-up appointment to 40% of their self-poisoners; this was for two reasons. Firstly, these patients did not have a problem for which psychiatric treatment was appropriate and secondly, many of these patients had an entrenched personality disorder, which made it unlikely that psychiatric intervention would be beneficial.

Type
Brief Reports
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 150 , Issue 2 , February 1987 , pp. 246 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carney, M. W. P., Roth, M. & Garside, R. F. (1965) The diagnosis of depressive syndromes and the prediction of ECT response. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 659–674.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Kessel, W. I. N. & Lee, E. M. (1962) Attempted suicide in Edinburgh. Scottish Medical Journal, 7, 130–135.Google ScholarPubMed
Kreitman, N. (1979) Reflections on the management of parasuicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 275.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. G., Barton, J., Pottle, S., Pocock, H. & Burne-Cox, C. J. (1976) Deliberate self-harm: a follow-up of 279 patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 361–368.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. W. (1981) The predictive validation of a suicide intent scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 391–395.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1970) Suicide and Attempted Suicide. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a Selected Group of Functional Disorders. New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.