Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:08:55.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Cognitive Behavioural Group Treatment of Bulimia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

John A. Schneider
Affiliation:
Behavioral Medicine Program Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
W. Stewart Agras
Affiliation:
Behavioral Medicine Program Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA

Summary

This study describes a group treatment of bulimia using an adaptation of Fairburn's (1981) cognitive behavioural approach. Thirteen bulimic women with a self-reported average of 24 self-induced vomiting episodes per week were treated in two groups; each group met once a week for 16 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the number of self-reported vomiting episodes; pre- and post-treatment measures of eating attitudes, depression, assertiveness, and global level of psychological distress were also evaluated. Vomiting frequency decreased to an average 2.2 times per week (a 91% improvement) with seven patients abstinent by the end of treatment. Significant pre- to post-treatment changes were also demonstrated on measures of depression, eating attitudes, and assertiveness. Six-month follow-up data on 11 patients indicate a mean vomiting frequency of 3.8 per week; six patients maintained their progress. Although Fairburn had greater success using an individual cognitive behavioural approach, the results of the present study are promising for the development of a cost-effective treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, A., Ward, C., Mendelson, M., et al. (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boskind-White, M. & White, W. C. (1983) Bulimarexia, the binge/purge cycle. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. & Fairburn, C. G. (1983) Binge-eating and self-induced vomiting in the community: A preliminary study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 139144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L. R. (1977) SCL-90 (revised) Manual I. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.Google Scholar
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edition) (1980) Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Fairburn, C. (1981) A cognitive behavioural approach to the treatment of bulimia. Psychological Medicine, 11, 707711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambrill, E. D. & Richey, C. A. (1975) An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behavior Therapy 6, 550561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, D. M. & Garfinkel, P. E. (1979) The eating attitudes test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9, 273279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, F. T. & Solyom, L. (1971) The treatment of compulsive vomiting through faradic disruption of mental images. Journal of the Canadian Medical Association, 105, 10711073.Google ScholarPubMed
Pyle, R. L., Mitchell, J. E., Eckert, E. D., Halvorson, P. A., Neuman, P. A. & Goff, G. M. (1983) The incidence of bulimia in freshman college students. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2, 7585.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, J. C. & Leitenberg, H. (1982) Bulimia nervosa: Treatment with exposure and response prevention. Behavior Therapy, 13, 117124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, G. J. (1979) The treatment of compulsive vomiting and obsessive thoughts through graduated response delay, response prevention, and cognitive correction. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 10, 7782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W. C. & Boskind-White, M. (1981) An experimental-behavioral approach to the treatment of bulimarexia. Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice, 18, 501–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.