Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:39:21.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Clinical Distinction between Psychotic and Neurotic Depressions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

R. E. Kendell  and
Jane Gourlay
R. E. Kendell
Affiliation:
The Institute of Psychiatry, The Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Jane Gourlay
Affiliation:
The Institute of Psychiatry, The Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Proof that two clinical syndromes are distinct entities depends on a demonstration that patients with features of both syndromes are less common than those with features only of the one or the other. The intermediate forms, the greys, must be shown to be less numerous than the blacks and the whites, which means in graphical terms that a bimodal distribution of scores must be demonstrated on some chosen dimension. The optimal dimension for this purpose is Fisher's discriminant function (Fisher, 1936; Rao, 1948), and it may be useful before proceeding further to describe how this is derived. From the universe of all patients with syndrome X (psychotic depression) or syndrome Y (neurotic depression) every patient is assigned to one or other category, and the two populations are then rated on a series of N items which comprise the recognized discriminators between the two syndromes. From these data the analysis produces a set of weights for the N items which maximizes the ratio of between group to within group variance. The effect of this is that, when a single weighted score is calculated for each patient by combining the weights of the relevant items, the overlap between the scores of members of the two populations, X and Y, is reduced to a minimum. If the distribution of the scores of X and Y combined is bimodal the validity of the distinction between the two is confirmed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 117 , Issue 538 , September 1970 , pp. 257 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., Sartorius, N., and Farkas, T. (1968). ‘Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: some results from the first comparative investigation.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 125 (Apr. Suppl.), 21–9.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1936). ‘The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems.’ Ann. Eugen. (Lond.), 7, 179–84Google Scholar
General Register Office (1968). A Glossary of Mental Disorders. Studies on Medical and Population Subjects, No. 22. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E. (1968). The Classification of Depressive Illnesses. London.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E. (1969). ‘The continuum model of depressive illness.’ Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 62, 335–9.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Everett, B., Cooper, J. E., David, M. E., and Sartorius, N. (1968). ‘The reliability of the Present State Examination.’ Soc. Psychiat., 3, 123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1948). ‘The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification.’ J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 10, 159–93.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.