Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T05:46:28.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stephen D. Hart ,
Christine Michie  and
David J. Cooke
Stephen D. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6. Email: [email protected]
Christine Michie
Affiliation:
Glasgow Centre for the Study of Violence, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
David J. Cooke
Affiliation:
Glasgow Centre for the Study of Violence, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 192 , Issue 2 , February 2008 , pp. 154
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008 

References

1 Grove, WM, Meehl, PE. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychol Public Policy Law 1996; 2: 293–323.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.