In the original version of this article, it was incorrectly stated in the abstract that the pharmacological therapy used had CI 1.80–1.30. This should have been CI 1.08-1.30.
The article has been updated to reflect this both online and in print.
Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2018
In the original version of this article, it was incorrectly stated in the abstract that the pharmacological therapy used had CI 1.80–1.30. This should have been CI 1.08-1.30.
The article has been updated to reflect this both online and in print.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.