Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:18:08.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between a history of clinical depression and dementia, and the role of sociodemographic factors: population-based cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2022

Kaarina Korhonen*
Affiliation:
Population Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
Lasse Tarkiainen
Affiliation:
Population Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland and Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies (URBARIA), University of Helsinki, Finland
Taina Leinonen
Affiliation:
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland
Elina Einiö
Affiliation:
Population Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
Pekka Martikainen
Affiliation:
Population Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland; Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden; and Laboratory of Population Health, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany
*
Correspondence: Kaarina Korhonen. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Depression is associated with an increased dementia risk, but the nature of the association in the long-term remains unresolved, and the role of sociodemographic factors mainly unexplored.

Aims

To assess whether a history of clinical depression is associated with dementia in later life, controlling for observed sociodemographic factors and unobserved factors shared by siblings, and to test whether gender, educational level and marital status modify the association.

Method

We conducted a national cohort study of 1 616 321 individuals aged 65 years or older between 2001 and 2018 using administrative healthcare data. A history of depression was ascertained from the national hospital register in the period 15–30 years prior to dementia follow-up. We used conventional and sibling fixed-effects Cox regression models to analyse the association between a history of depression, sociodemographic factors and dementia.

Results

A history of depression was related to an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI 1.23–1.31) for dementia in the conventional Cox model and of 1.55 (95% CI 1.09–2.20) in the sibling fixed-effects model. Depression was related to an elevated dementia risk similarly across all levels of education (test for interaction, P = 0.84), but the association was weaker for the widowed than for the married (P = 0.003), and stronger for men than women (P = 0.006). The excess risk among men attenuated following covariate adjustment (P = 0.10).

Discussion

This study shows that a history of depression is consistently associated with later-life dementia risk. The results support the hypothesis that depression is an aetiological risk factor for dementia.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Background

Depression and dementia are highly disabling disorders contributing to the global disease burden and challenging the sustainability of healthcare systems.Reference Nichols, Szoeke, Vollset, Abbasi, Abd-Allah and Abdela1,Reference Liu, He, Yang, Feng, Zhao and Lyu2 Depressive symptoms commonly coexist with dementia,Reference Zhao, Tan, Wang, Jiang, Tan and Tan3 and recently, late-life depression was estimated to contribute to 4% of all worldwide dementia cases.Reference Livingston, Huntley, Sommerlad, Ames, Ballard and Banerjee4 Despite systematic review evidence on depression doubling the risk of dementia onset,Reference Cherbuin, Kim and Anstey5 the question about whether depression is an aetiological risk factor for dementia remains unresolved. This is because late-life depression or depressive symptoms in close proximity to dementia onset may in fact be prodromal features of dementia itself.Reference Singh-Manoux, Dugravot, Fournier, Abell, Ebmeier and Kivimäki6,Reference Brommelhoff, Gatz, Johansson, McArdle, Fratiglioni and Pedersen7 An important limitation of previous studies is that they have not considered the temporal dimension in the association between depression and dementia onset. Only a few studies have analysed the association separately for earlier- and late-life depression.Reference da Silva, Goncalves-Pereira, Xavier and Mukaetova-Ladinska8 Although some such studies reported a consistent association between depression and dementia as long as 20 years apart,Reference Holmquist, Nordström and Nordström9Reference Pálsson, Aevarsson and Skoog12 other studies only observed an association when depression occurred less than about 10 years before dementia diagnosisReference Singh-Manoux, Dugravot, Fournier, Abell, Ebmeier and Kivimäki6,Reference Brommelhoff, Gatz, Johansson, McArdle, Fratiglioni and Pedersen7 or after the age of 45 or 50 years.Reference Li, Wang, Shofer, Thompson, Peskind and McCormick13,Reference Steffens, Plassman, Helms, Welsh-Bohmer, Saunders and Breitner14 The inconsistency in findings may relate to differences in measurement of depression, follow-up times and characteristics of the study populations. Furthermore, only a few studiesReference Holmquist, Nordström and Nordström9,Reference Steffens, Plassman, Helms, Welsh-Bohmer, Saunders and Breitner14 have been able to control for childhood family background to account for the strong familial aggregation of both depression and dementia. For example, the low socioeconomic position of the childhood family may increase the risk of both depression and dementia.

Although many of the previous studies have controlled for sociodemographic factors, the modifying effects remain mainly unexplored. Prior studies have investigated gender and education modification in prodromal depressionReference da Silva, Goncalves-Pereira, Xavier and Mukaetova-Ladinska8,Reference Geerlings, Bouter, Schoevers, Beekman, Jonker and Deeg15 but, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has explicitly analysed the role of sociodemographic factors in the association between depression and dementia in the long term. Identifying susceptible population subgroups may elucidate potential mechanisms linking depression and dementia and help target dementia interventions effectively. In Finland, depression is among the leading causes of disability in the working-age population and about 10% of adults have experienced depression within the past 12 months.Reference Markkula, Suvisaari, Saarni, Pirkola, Peña and Saarni16 At the same time, the number of people living with dementia is rapidly increasing, dementia already being the third leading cause of death in Finland. The high prevalence of depression and the growing elderly population suggest an urgent need to enhance understanding and awareness of the association between depression and dementia.

Aims of study

We conducted a register-based cohort study on Finnish older adults to estimate the association between a history of clinical depression and dementia, and to assess whether sociodemographic factors including gender, educational level and marital status modify the association. We also estimated sibling fixed-effects models controlling for unobserved early-life familial conditions and genetic factors shared by siblings that might confound the association between depression and dementia. As the preclinical and prodromal stages of dementia generally begin 10–15 years before the clinical stage,Reference Vermunt, Sikkes, Van Den Hout, Handels, Bos and Van Der Flier17 we used information on depression diagnoses observed in hospital registers in the period from 15 to 30 years before the follow-up for dementia in order to reduce bias arising from depressive symptoms reflecting preclinical and prodromal stages of dementia.

Method

Data and variables

We used population register data on all Finns born between 1900 and 1950 obtained from Statistics Finland. The cohort was followed, through record linkage using personal identification codes assigned to all permanent residents, for incident dementia at the age of 65 years and above in administrative health registers from 2001 through 2018. The baseline for follow-up thus varied from year 2000 to 2015 according to the year of birth. Information on sociodemographic characteristics was obtained from population censuses conducted in 1970, 1975, 1980 and 1985 and from the population register from 1987 to 2018. The sibling analysis was based on a 10% household sample from the 1950 Finnish population census that has been linked to subsequent census records and the population register. Children living in the same family at the age of 0 to 15 years in 1950 were identified as siblings by means of unique family identifiers. The family is defined based on the youngest generation in the household dwelling-unit, and thus siblings could only be identified if they did not have children of their own. We therefore limited the age range to 15 years, when childbearing was still rare. The sibling subsample thus included cohorts born between 1935 and 1950.

We identified dementia using the medication reimbursement register of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland and the hospital care register of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Thus our definition of dementia only included people on dementia medication or receiving hospital care. We collected the beginning (month and year) of entitlement to special state reimbursement of antidementia medication, and the dates of state-reimbursed purchases of antidementia medication using the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code N06D. Specialised out-patient care and in-patient hospital admissions with a dementia diagnosis were collected with World Health Organization ICD-10Reference World Health Organization18 codes F00–03, F05.1 and G30. The earliest entry in any of these registers was set as the date of dementia incidence. These data sources present good sensitivity and high precision for dementia diagnosis,Reference Solomon, Ngandu, Soininen, Hallikainen, Kivipelto and Laatikainen19 and the age-specific incidence rates observed in our data (Supplementary Table 1 available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.217) are consistent with reports for screened community samples.Reference Wolters, Chibnik, Waziry, Anderson, Berr and Beiser20

To restrict the study population to initially dementia-free individuals, we excluded those with pre-baseline reimbursements of antidementia medication (reimbursement became available in 1999) or hospital admissions with a dementia diagnosis indicated by ICD-10 codes in 1996–2000 and ICD-9Reference World Health Organization21 codes 290, 2912A, 2928C, 2941A, 3310, 3311 and 4378A in 1987–1995 (n = 24 543). Because dementia is among the main indications of institutional residence, we further restricted the study population to those living in private households at baseline (n = 49 384 excluded).

Data on clinical depression 15 to 30 years before baseline was collected from the hospital care register. In-patient care episodes with a depression diagnosis were identified using ICD-8Reference World Health Organization22 codes 2960, 2980, 3004 and 3011 in 1971–1986, ICD-9 codes 2961, 2968, 3004, 3009 and 3090 in 1987–1995, and ICD-10 codes F32, F33, F34.1 and F38.1 in 1996–2000. Individuals with at least one care episode with a depression diagnosis were classified as having a history of clinical depression.

Information on educational level and marital status was collected from the period 15 to 30 years before baseline. Education was indicated as the highest achieved qualification, categorised as tertiary (generally ≥13 years of education), secondary (10–12 years) and basic education or less (up to 9 years). Marital status was classified as married, divorced, widowed and never married. If education or marital status changed during the observation period, we considered the most recent status. We further included other medical conditions as covariates to indicate vascular risk factors (for example smoking, excessive alcohol use, diabetes) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) that are shown to be comorbid to depressionReference Penninx23 and to influence dementia risk.Reference Hernán, Alonso and Logroscino24,Reference Rehm, Hasan, Black, Shield and Schwarzinger25 These conditions were measured from 15 to 30 years before baseline from the hospital care register, and included alcohol-related diseases and accidental poisoning by alcohol, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD), and other non-stroke CVDs. Stroke was excluded because of the direct short-term effect on (post-stroke) dementia (for ICD-codes see Supplementary Table 2). Because depression history and the covariates could only be defined for Finnish residents, we excluded those living abroad over the period 15 to 30 years prior to baseline (n = 14 914).

Statistical analyses

We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for the association between a history of clinical depression and dementia between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018. Cohorts turning 65 years in year 2001 or later entered the analysis on the 1 January following their 65th birthday. Attained age in years was used as the underlying timescale in the analyses. Individuals were censored on the date of death, at the end of the year preceding emigration or at the end of 2018, whichever came first.

We first used conventional Cox models to estimate the association between a history of clinical depression and dementia, controlling for observed characteristics. In addition to underlying attained age, model 1 adjusted for gender and calendar year. Model 2 accounted additionally for education and marital status, and model 3 further adjusted for comorbid medical conditions. Second, we used Cox regression with sibling fixed-effects by assuming a separate baseline hazard for each childhood family (n = 23 626) to control for all time-invariant characteristics shared by siblings.Reference Allison26 We further controlled for the same observed characteristics as in the conventional Cox models. Third, modification by gender, educational level and marital status was analysed in the full cohort, with basic (model 1) and full adjustments (model 3). The significance of interaction was analysed using the likelihood ratio test. All analyses were performed with Stata 16.0.

Sensitivity analyses

As selection for health and survival may bias the estimates in studies of older people,Reference Hernán, Alonso and Logroscino24,Reference Euser, Schram, Hofman, Westendorp and Breteler27 we conducted age-stratified analyses to assess whether the associations changed with increasing age at study inclusion. We used three groups: cohorts born in 1935–1950 (aged 65 years at baseline), cohorts born in 1920–1934 (66–80 years) and cohorts born in 1900–1919 (81–100 years).

Ethics of research

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human participants were approved by Statistics Finland Board of Ethics (permit no. TK-53-1490-18). Participant consent was not required as administrative register data can be used for scientific purposes under the Personal Data Act and the Statistics Act. Statistics Finland pseudonymised the data prior to providing it to researchers.

Results

In the full cohort of 1 616 321 individuals (55.9% female), we identified 23 959 (1.5%) individuals with a history of clinical depression. In the subsample of 63 445 siblings (51.3% female), depression had been diagnosed for 948 (1.5%) individuals. Mean (s.d.) baseline age of the full cohort was 68.9 (6.2) years, and the sibling subsample was by definition 65 years at baseline. Table 1 shows the frequencies and descriptive values of sociodemographic and health variables.

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the full cohort and the sibling subsample

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

a. Alcohol-related diseases and accidental poisoning by alcohol.

During 14 725 473 person-years at risk (mean follow-up time 9.1 years), 274 817 individuals were identified with dementia in the full cohort.

Table 2 displays the results from the conventional Cox regression for the full cohort. In the minimally adjusted model 1, depression was associated with a significantly increased hazard of dementia (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.28–1.36). Also, secondary (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.10–1.13) and basic education (HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.16–1.19), and all unmarried statuses (HR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.10–1.13 for divorced; HR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.06 for widowed; HR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.07 for never married) were associated with dementia at the 95% confidence level.

Table 2 Hazard ratios for dementia by a history of clinical depression and covariates in the conventional Cox regression on the full cohort

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

a. Each exposure variable modelled separately; adjusted for gender and calendar year.

b. Exposure variables mutually adjusted; adjusted for gender and calendar year.

c. Reference: not having this particular condition.

d. Alcohol-related diseases and accidental poisoning by alcohol.

The hazard of dementia was also elevated for those with alcohol-related conditions (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.28–1.37), COPD/asthma (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.09), diabetes (HR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.45–1.60), CHD (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.08–1.12) and other CVDs (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.05). In model 2, adjusting for education and marital status, the associations of depression, education and marital status with dementia remained substantially unchanged. In the fully adjusted model further adjusting for medical conditions (model 3), depression was associated with a 27% (95% CI 1.23–1.31) excess hazard of dementia.

In the sibling subsample, 4508 individuals during 546 129 person-years at risk (mean follow-up time 8.6 years) were identified with dementia. Table 3 presents the results from the sibling fixed-effects models. Adjusting for the unobserved factors shared by siblings, the association between a history of clinical depression and dementia was stronger than in the conventional model but the confidence interval also became wider (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.17–2.33; model 1). In addition, having never married (HR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.03–1.42), alcohol-related conditions (HR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.27–2.61) and diabetes (HR = 3.40; 95% CI 1.97–5.88) were associated with dementia. In the model further adjusting for observed education and marital status (model 2), the excess hazard related to depression slightly attenuated (HR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.13–2.27). Adjusting additionally for observed medical conditions (model 3), depression was associated with a HR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.09–2.20) for dementia.

Table 3 Hazard ratios for dementia by a history of clinical depression and covariates in the sibling fixed-effects Cox regression on the sibling subsample

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

a. Each exposure variable modelled separately; adjusted for gender and calendar year.

b. Exposure variables mutually adjusted; adjusted for gender and calendar year.

c. Reference: not having this particular condition.

d. Alcohol-related diseases and accidental poisoning by alcohol.

Compared with individuals without a history of clinical depression, the excess hazard of dementia related to depression was stronger among men (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.34–1.49) than women (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.24–1.34; test for interaction x 2(1) = 7.72, P = 0.006) (Fig. 1(a)). Adjustment for other sociodemographic and medical conditions, however, attenuated the association to the same level for both genders (x 2(1) = 2.69, P = 0.10). Further inspection revealed that alcohol-related conditions in particular explained the stronger association among men (results not shown). A history of clinical depression was associated with an elevated hazard of dementia similarly across all levels of education (x 2(2) = 0.34; P = 0.84) (Fig. 1(b)). By contrast, the association between depression and dementia differed by marital status (x 2(3) = 13.97; P = 0.003) (Fig. 1(c)). Specifically, the association was weaker among the widowed (HR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.07–1.26) than the married (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.31–1.41). The moderation was not explained by the covariates (x 2(3) = 13.35, P = 0.004).

Fig. 1 Association between a history of clinical depression and dementia by (a) gender, (b) educational level, and (c) marital status.

Hazard ratio = 1.00 for no history of clinical depression. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Sensitivity analyses

Age-stratified analyses indicated that our main results primarily reflect associations observed in cohorts born in 1920–1934, who experienced most of the observed incident dementia cases (Supplementary Table 3). Among cohorts born in 1935–1950, the association between depression and dementia (HR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.44–1.61; Supplementary Table 4) reflected estimates obtained in the sibling analysis (Table 3). In these cohorts, depression was tentatively more strongly associated with dementia among women than men (Supplementary Figure 1). Furthermore, the association was stronger for those with a basic education compared with those who were more highly educated (Supplementary Figure 2) but no differences emerged by marital status (Supplementary Figure 3). Among the oldest cohorts born in 1900–1919, a history of clinical depression was not associated with dementia (Supplementary Table 5).

Discussion

In a large register-based cohort study of 1 616 321 individuals, we found an elevated risk of dementia related to having been diagnosed with depression 15 to 30 years before baseline. Cohort members with a history of clinical depression had around a 30% higher hazard of developing dementia compared with those with no history of depression, even after accounting for differences in educational level, marital status and several comorbid medical conditions. A similar association was found when we compared siblings to each other, adjusting for unobserved characteristics shared by siblings in addition to the observed characteristics. Our results thus align with the hypothesis that depression is an aetiological risk factor for dementia. Furthermore, our results show that depression is related to an elevated dementia risk similarly across all levels of education, but the association is generally stronger for men than women, and weaker for the widowed than for the married.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly assess whether sociodemographic factors modify the long-term association between depression and dementia. Our results show that the association was not specific to any of the assessed sociodemographic subpopulations, although the strength of association varied in terms of gender and marital status. The stronger association among men attenuated, however, to a statistically non-significant level following covariate adjustment. Our supplementary analyses indicated that the attenuation was mainly the result of adjustment for alcohol-related conditions. Alcohol use disorder is frequently comorbid with major depression, especially among men,Reference Hunt, Malhi, Lai and Cleary28 and heavy alcohol use is associated with an increased risk of dementia.Reference Rehm, Hasan, Black, Shield and Schwarzinger25 Nevertheless, our sensitivity analyses suggested that in younger cohorts born in 1935–1950, the association between a history of depression and dementia may in fact be stronger among women than men, despite the higher prevalence of alcohol-related conditions among men. Because the different cohorts were followed for incident dementia partly at different ages, these analyses do not disclose whether the stronger association among women in these cohorts reflects a cohort effect (the stronger association among women will persist with age) or an age effect (the stronger association will attenuate with age). The nature of the gender difference will be an important point for future enquiry.

The association between a history of clinical depression and dementia was weaker among the widowed compared with the married. This finding may arise from selective survival: widowhood is related to higher mortality,Reference Shor, Roelfs, Curreli, Clemow, Burg and Schwartz29 and thus the surviving widow(er)s may be more selected on health characteristics. Furthermore, our sensitivity analyses suggest that selective survival may also attenuate the overall association between depression and dementia. Similar attenuation and even reversal of association with increasing age has also been reported for other dementia risk factors including smoking,Reference Hernán, Alonso and Logroscino24 suggesting that individuals with certain risk factors and susceptible to developing dementia do so before reaching the oldest old age.

These findings add to the existing evidence base showing a long-term association between depression and dementia.Reference Holmquist, Nordström and Nordström9Reference Pálsson, Aevarsson and Skoog12 Our analysis on siblings suggest that the association between depression and dementia is not likely to arise from early-life familial background such as childhood adversity or genetic factors shared by siblings. Similar findings have previously been reported by a Swedish register studyReference Holmquist, Nordström and Nordström9 and a US twin study, although the latter did not observe statistically significant results for early-onset depression in either conventional (risk ratio 1.4, 95% CI 0.7–2.9) or sibling stratified (risk ratio 1.6, 95% CI 0.5–5.3) analysis.Reference Steffens, Plassman, Helms, Welsh-Bohmer, Saunders and Breitner14 In contrast to the previous studies,Reference Holmquist, Nordström and Nordström9,Reference Steffens, Plassman, Helms, Welsh-Bohmer, Saunders and Breitner14 we also adjusted for differences in educational level between those with and without a history of depression. Education is a strong determinant of both depression and dementia, and thus it was important to explicitly assess the extent to which education confounded the association between the two conditions. Our analysis shows that the association was not explained by shared family background or educational level, thus providing more evidence for a non-spurious relationship between depression and dementia.

In light of these and previous results, it seems likely that both explanations for an association between depression and dementia are valid: depressive symptoms reflect prodromal stages when they appear in close proximity to dementia onset, and depression earlier in life may increase the risk of neurodegeneration itself. This is also reflected in the study by Singh-Manoux et al,Reference Singh-Manoux, Dugravot, Fournier, Abell, Ebmeier and Kivimäki6 which found that individuals with dementia had more depressive symptoms not only less than 10 years before dementia diagnosis but also more than 20 years before diagnosis compared with individuals without dementia. The results of their prospective analysis did not, however, reach statistical significance.Reference Singh-Manoux, Dugravot, Fournier, Abell, Ebmeier and Kivimäki6 This highlights the considerable demands on data, especially in cohort studies of older people. In such studies, the most vulnerable and frail individuals tend to drop-out from follow-up; consequently, the numbers of cases of people with depression and dementia becomes small. We were in a fortunate position to overcome these potential problems as we used large register-based data without bias because of self-selection or non-random attrition.

The causal mechanisms through which depression may contribute to dementia risk are still not fully known. The suggested pathways relate to hippocampal atrophy because of the activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and increased glucocorticoid production, and raised levels of proinflammatory cytokines.Reference Herbert and Lucassen30 Furthermore, depression is associated with several vascular risk factors and CVD,Reference Penninx23 establishing a potential mediating pathway to increased dementia risk.Reference Livingston, Huntley, Sommerlad, Ames, Ballard and Banerjee4,Reference Kuz´ma, Lourida, Moore, Levine, Ukoumunne and Llewellyn31 Our adjustments for comorbid medical conditions cover part of these mediating factors but accounting for these attenuated the association only modestly. Although we cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding, our analysis provides strong evidence for a long-term association between the two conditions.

Impact and relevance

The consistent long-term association between a history of clinical depression and later-life dementia risk highlight that patients presenting with depression at working age, especially if severe, should be monitored for cognitive function in the long term. Furthermore, information about a patient's depression history should be utilised in the assessment of cognitive impairment and timely detection of dementia. The results also suggest that any success in fighting depression in those of working age will have an outsized societal impact throughout adult life in terms of, for example, improved workability and delayed or avoided early exit from the labour force and the need for long-term institutional care.

Strengths and limitations

The long follow-up in population and health registers provided an opportunity to study the long-term association between depression and dementia. All our measures came from administrative registers, and were thus collected prospectively and were not subject to self- or surrogate reporting biases. Both depression and dementia were diagnosed by a physician, entailing high specificity.

We also acknowledge the limitations of the study. First, the study is observational in design and thus cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between depression and dementia. The long gap between depression diagnosis and dementia follow-up, however, reduces the likelihood that our results are biased by preclinical symptoms of dementia. Second, the use of hospital diagnoses entails that less severe depressive episodes not requiring hospital care remained undetected, and thus the results reflect first and foremost an association for hospital-treated depression. Third, despite the reasonably good sensitivity of our register-based measure of dementia,Reference Solomon, Ngandu, Soininen, Hallikainen, Kivipelto and Laatikainen19 not all people with dementia could be identified. However, since the age-specific incidence rates were consistent with those obtained from screened community samples,Reference Wolters, Chibnik, Waziry, Anderson, Berr and Beiser20 we believe that our results are not biased because of people with undiagnosed cases. Finally, although the sibling fixed-effects model controls for all unmeasured time-invariant characteristics shared by siblings, it is likely that many other characteristics are not shared by siblings. For example, only half of the genes are shared and thus the model does not fully exclude the possibility of common genetic antecedents. Also, other non-shared characteristics might confound the association, but we believe that these differences were at least partly captured by controlling for observed individual characteristics including educational level and health characteristics.

In conclusion, our results showed a consistent long-term association between a history of clinical depression and dementia, in line with the aetiological risk-factor hypothesis. Although the causal mechanisms are not yet clear, better management and treatment of mental health problems when people are working age should play a role in dementia prevention.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.217.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Statistics Finland, the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of Statistics Finland and the Social and Health Data Permit Authority Findata.

Author contributions

K.K. conceived the study. P.M. acquired the data. K.K. designed the analysis, with input from L.T., T.L., E.E. and P.M.. The analysis and interpretation of the data was carried out by K.K., with contributions from L.T., T.L., E.E. and P.M.. The initial version of the manuscript was written by K.K. All authors contributed to the final version, revising it critically for intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Eino Jutikkala Fund and the Finnish Cultural Foundation, and travel grants from the Finnish Concordia Fund and the Doctoral School in Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Helsinki (K.K.). P.M., L.T. and K.K. were supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 Programme under grant agreement n° 667661 (Promoting mental wellbeing in the ageing population – MINDMAP). The study does not necessarily reflect the Commission's views and in no way anticipates the Commission's future policy in this area. P.M., L.T. and K.K. were also supported by NordForsk under grant agreement n° 83540 (WELLIFE). P.M. has received funding from the Academy of Finland under grant agreements n° 294861 and n° 1308247. L.T. is employed in URBARIA in a postdoctoral research position funded by the municipalities of the Helsinki capital region. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Declaration of interest

None.

References

Nichols, E, Szoeke, CE, Vollset, SE, Abbasi, N, Abd-Allah, F, Abdela, J, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18: 88106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q, He, H, Yang, J, Feng, X, Zhao, F, Lyu, J. Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: findings from the global burden of disease study. J Psych Res 2020; 126: 134–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Q-F, Tan, L, Wang, H-F, Jiang, T, Tan, M-S, Tan, L, et al. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2016; 190: 264–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingston, G, Huntley, J, Sommerlad, A, Ames, D, Ballard, C, Banerjee, S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. Lancet 2020; 396: 413–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherbuin, N, Kim, S, Anstey, KJ. Dementia risk estimates associated with measures of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e008853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh-Manoux, A, Dugravot, A, Fournier, A, Abell, J, Ebmeier, K, Kivimäki, M, et al. Trajectories of depressive symptoms before diagnosis of dementia: a 28-year follow-up study. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74: 712–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brommelhoff, JA, Gatz, M, Johansson, B, McArdle, JJ, Fratiglioni, L, Pedersen, NL. Depression as a risk factor or prodromal feature for dementia? Findings in a population-based sample of Swedish twins. Psychol Aging 2009; 24: 373–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
da Silva, J, Goncalves-Pereira, M, Xavier, M, Mukaetova-Ladinska, EB. Affective disorders and risk of developing dementia: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 177–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmquist, S, Nordström, A, Nordström, P. The association of depression with subsequent dementia diagnosis: a Swedish nationwide cohort study from 1964 to 2016. PLoS Med 2020; 17: e1003016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, DE, Yaffe, K, Byers, AL, McCormick, M, Schaefer, C, Whitmer, RA. Midlife vs late-life depressive symptoms and risk of dementia: differential effects for Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 493–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, RC, Cupples, LA, Kurz, A, Auerbach, S, Go, R, Sadovnick, D, et al. Depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: the MIRAGE study. Arch Neurol 2003; 60: 753–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pálsson, S, Aevarsson, Ó, Skoog, I. Depression, cerebral atrophy, cognitive performance and incidence of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 249–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G, Wang, LY, Shofer, JB, Thompson, ML, Peskind, ER, McCormick, W, et al. Temporal relationship between depression and dementia: findings from a large community-based 15-year follow-up study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 970–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffens, DC, Plassman, BL, Helms, MJ, Welsh-Bohmer, KA, Saunders, AM, Breitner, JC. A twin study of late-onset depression and apolipoprotein E ε4 as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychiatry 1997; 41: 851–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geerlings, MI, Bouter, LM, Schoevers, RA, Beekman, ATF, Jonker, C, Deeg, DJH, et al. Depression and risk of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease: results of two prospective community-based studies in The Netherlands. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176: 568–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markkula, N, Suvisaari, J, Saarni, SI, Pirkola, S, Peña, S, Saarni, S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of major depressive disorder and dysthymia in an eleven-year follow-up–results from the finnish health 2011 survey. J Affect Disord 2015; 173: 7380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, L, Sikkes, SA, Van Den Hout, A, Handels, R, Bos, I, Van Der Flier, WM, et al. Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 15: 888–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, . International classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision 2nd ed. World Health Organization, 2004.Google Scholar
Solomon, A, Ngandu, T, Soininen, H, Hallikainen, MM, Kivipelto, M, Laatikainen, T. Validity of dementia and Alzheimer's disease diagnoses in finnish national registers. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 10: 303–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolters, FJ, Chibnik, LB, Waziry, R, Anderson, R, Berr, C, Beiser, A, et al. Twenty-seven-year time trends in dementia incidence in Europe and the United States: the Alzheimer cohorts consortium. Neurology 2020; 95: e519–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, . International classification of diseases, 9th revision (1975 revision). World Health Organization, 1977.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, . Manual of the international statistical classification of disease, injuries, and causes of death. Based on the recommendations of the eighth revision conference, 1965, and adopted by the Nineteenth World Health Assembly. World Health Organization, 1967.Google Scholar
Penninx, BW. Depression and cardiovascular disease: epidemiological evidence on their linking mechanisms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 74: 277–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernán, MA, Alonso, A, Logroscino, G. Commentary: cigarette smoking and dementia: potential selection bias in the elderly. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 448–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, J, Hasan, OS, Black, SE, Shield, KD, Schwarzinger, M. Alcohol use and dementia: a systematic scoping review. Alzheimers Res Ther 2019; 11: 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, PD. Fixed Effects Regression Models (Vol. 160). SAGE Publications, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euser, SM, Schram, MT, Hofman, A, Westendorp, RG, Breteler, MM. Measuring cognitive function with age: the influence of selection by health and survival. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 440–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, GE, Malhi, GS, Lai, HMX, Cleary, M. Prevalence of comorbid substance use in major depressive disorder in community and clinical settings, 1990–2019: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2020; 266: 288304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shor, E, Roelfs, DJ, Curreli, M, Clemow, L, Burg, MM, Schwartz, JE. Widowhood and mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Demography 2012; 49: 575606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbert, J, Lucassen, PJ. Depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: genes, steroids, cytokines and neurogenesis–what do we need to know? Front Neuroendocrinol 2016; 41: 153–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuz´ma, E, Lourida, I, Moore, SF, Levine, DA, Ukoumunne, OC, Llewellyn, DJ. Stroke and dementia risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14: 1416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the full cohort and the sibling subsample

Figure 1

Table 2 Hazard ratios for dementia by a history of clinical depression and covariates in the conventional Cox regression on the full cohort

Figure 2

Table 3 Hazard ratios for dementia by a history of clinical depression and covariates in the sibling fixed-effects Cox regression on the sibling subsample

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Association between a history of clinical depression and dementia by (a) gender, (b) educational level, and (c) marital status.Hazard ratio = 1.00 for no history of clinical depression. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Supplementary material: PDF

Korhonen et al. supplementary material

Korhonen et al. supplementary material
Download Korhonen et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.