Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:41:22.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of General Practitioners in Care of Long-Term Mentally Ill Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Amanda Poynton  and
Peter Higgins
Amanda Poynton
Affiliation:
York Clinic, Guy's Hospital, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT
Peter Higgins
Affiliation:
University of London, Waitings, Healthfield Lane, Chislehurst, Kent BR7 6AH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Objective – To assess general practitioners' involvement with long term mentally ill patients and attitudes towards their care.

Design – Postal questionnaire survey.

Setting – General practices in South West Thames region.

Subjects – 507 general practitioners, 369 (73%) of whom returned the questionnaire.

Main outcome measures – The number of adult long term mentally ill patients whom general practitioners estimate they have on their lists and general practitioners' willingness to take responsibility for them.

Results – 110 respondents had noticed an effect of the discharge of adult long term mentally ill patients on their practices. Most (225) respondents estimated that they had 10 or fewer such patients each on their lists. Having higher numbers was significantly associated with practising in Greater London or within three miles of a large mental hospital and having contact with a psychiatrist visiting the practice. 333 general practitioners would agree to share the care of long term mentally ill patients with the psychiatrist by taking responsibility for the patients' physical problems. Only 59 would agree to act as a key worker, 308 preferring the community psychiatric nurse to do it. Only nine had specific practice policies for looking after long term mentally ill patients and 287 agreed that such patients often come to their general practitioner's attention only when there is a crisis.

Conclusions – The uneven distribution of long term mentally ill patients suggests that community psychiatric resources might be better targeted at those practices with higher numbers of such patients. Most general practitioners seem to be receptive to a shared care plan where the consultant takes responsibility for monitoring psychiatric health with the community nurse as key worker. The lack of practice policies for reviewing the care of long term mentally ill patients must limit general practitioners' ability to prevent crises developing in their care.”

Type
The Current Literature
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 159 , Issue 5 , November 1991 , pp. 703 - 706
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goldberg, D. & Huxley, P. (1980) Mental Illness in the Community. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Holloway, F. (1990) ‘Caring for People’: a critical review of British Government policy for the community care of the mentally ill. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14, 641–645.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T., Sibbald, B., Burns, T., et al (1991) Role of general practitioners in care of long term mentally ill patients. British Medical Journal, 302, 508–510.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M., Cooper, B., Brown, A. C., et al (1981) Psychiatric Illness in General Practice (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, J. & Furlong, R. (1986) A haven for the severely disabled within the context of a comprehensive community psychiatric service. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 449–457.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.