Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:51:11.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Ratio Estimation Method for Determining the Prevalence of Cocaine Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michael Gossop ,
John Strang ,
Paul Griffiths ,
Beverly Powis  and
Colin Taylor
Michael Gossop*
Affiliation:
Drug Transitions Study, National Addiction Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF
John Strang
Affiliation:
Drug Transitions Study, National Addiction Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF
Paul Griffiths
Affiliation:
Drug Transitions Study, National Addiction Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF
Beverly Powis
Affiliation:
Drug Transitions Study, National Addiction Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF
Colin Taylor
Affiliation:
Drug Transitions Study, National Addiction Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to estimating the prevalence of cocaine use, based upon a new ratio estimation technique. This method can be applied to random samples of overlapping populations for which no sampling frames exist. When the ratio estimation method is applied to the two study samples (drawn from populations of people using cocaine and people using heroin) the ratio of cocaine users to heroin users (C/H) was 1.55, with a 95% confidence interval of ±0.48. Such estimates should be applied with caution. However, if used with reference to national estimates of about 75 000 heroin users, application of the present estimate suggests that there may be about 116 000 cocaine users in the UK.

Type
Short Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 164 , Issue 5 , May 1994 , pp. 676 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (1988) AIDS and Drug Misuse: Part 1. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Andima, H., Krug, D., Bergner, L., et al (1973) A prevalence estimation model of narcotics addiction in New York City. American Journal of Epidemiology, 98, 56–62.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, S. (1990) Extent and pattern of drug abuse and dependence. In Substance Abuse and Dependence (ed. H. Ghodse). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ghodse, H. (1977) Casualty departments and the monitoring of drug dependence. British Medical Journal, 1, 1381–1382.Google Scholar
Gossop, M. (1987) Beware cocaine. British Medical Journal, 295, 945.Google Scholar
Gossop, M. & Grant, M. (1990) The Content and Structure of Methadone Treatment Programmes: A Study in Six Countries. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R., Daviaud, E., Lewis, R., et al (1985) Drug Problems: Assessing Local Needs. London: Drug Indicators Project.Google Scholar
Strang, J. & Edwards, G. (1989) Cocaine and crack. British Medical Journal, 299, 337–338.Google Scholar
Strang, J., Johns, A. & Caan, W. (1993) Cocaine in the UK – 1991. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1–13.Google Scholar
Wiebel, W. (1990) Identifying and gaining access to hidden populations. In The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations (ed. E. Lambert). Rockville: NIDA Research Monograph 98.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.