Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:12:21.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological Markers in the Detection of Autism in Infancy in a Large Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Simon Baron-Cohen ,
Antony Cox ,
Gillian Baird ,
John Swettenham ,
Natasha Nightingale ,
Kate Morgan ,
Auriol Drew  and
Tony Charman
Simon Baron-Cohen*
Affiliation:
Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Cambridge
Antony Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Gillian Baird
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
John Swettenham
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bloomfield Clinic, and Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Cambridge
Natasha Nightingale
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bloomfield Clinic and Newcomen Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Medical School, St Thomas' Street, London SE1 9RT
Kate Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bloomfield Clinic and Newcomen Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Medical School, St Thomas' Street, London SE1 9RT
Auriol Drew
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bloomfield Clinic and Newcomen Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Medical School, St Thomas' Street, London SE1 9RT
Tony Charman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, (Philips House), University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT
*
Dr Baron-Cohen, University of Cambridge, Department of Experimental Psychology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Investigation to see if there are key psychological risk indicators for autism in a random population study of children at 18 months of age; and to assess how well these discriminate children who receive a diagnosis of autism from other forms of developmental delay.

Method

Sixteen thousand children in the southeast of England were screened for autism by their health visitor or GP, during their routine 18-month-old developmental check-up, using the CHAT (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers). From a previous high-risk study we predicted that children at 18 months of age who failed three items (‘protodeclarative pointing‘, ‘gaze-monitoring‘, and ‘pretend play’) would be at risk for receiving a diagnosis of autism. From other evidence, we further predicted that those 18-month-olds who failed one or two of the key items (either pretend play, or protodeclarative pointing and pretend play) would be at risk for developmental delay without autism.

Results

Twelve children out of the total population of 16 000 consistently failed the three key items. Of these, 10 (83.3%) received a diagnosis of autism. Thus, the false positive rate was 16.6% (2 out of 12 cases), and even these 2 cases were not normal. When the 10 children with autism were reassessed at 3.5 years of age, their diagnosis remained the same. Thus the false positive rate among the cases diagnosed with autism was zero. In contrast, of 22 children who consistently failed either protodeclarative pointing and/or pretend play, none received a diagnosis of autism, but 15 (68.2%) received a diagnosis of language delay.

Conclusions

Consistent failure of the three key items from the CHAT at 18 months of age carries an 83.3% risk of autism; and this pattern of risk indicator is specific to autism when compared to other forms of developmental delay.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 168 , Issue 2 , February 1996 , pp. 158 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

In this latter subgroup, items Biii and Biv were omitted, since these would have been simply repeating questions A5 and A7.

2.

The Autism diagnosis actually contains 2 subgroups: Autism (without any developmental delay), and Autism + Developmental Delay.

3.

It should be noted however that with the judges who used the ADI–R (a parent-report measure only), criteria were slightly modified: To receive a diagnosis of autism, a child had to score above the traditional threshold on the first 2 axes (Reciprocal Social Interaction; and Communication), and score above a new threshold of 2 or more on the third axis (Repetitive Behaviour). This modification was made because many children scored above the traditional threshold on the first 2 axes, but just missed doing so on the third.

References

Baron-Cohen, S. (1987) Autism and symbolic play. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989) Perceptual role-taking and protodeclarative pointing in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Allen, J. & Gillberg, C. (1992) Can autism be detected at 18 months? The needle, the haystack, and the CHAT. British Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 839–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., et al (1979) Cognition and communication from 9–13 months: correlational findings. In The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy (ed Bates, E.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1984) Symbolic Play. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983) Child's Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., et al (1993) The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Gillberg, C. (1990) What is autism? International Review of Psychiatry, 2, 61–66.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1986) The Abilities of Babies. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Kanner, L. (1943) Autistic disturbance of affective contact Nervous Child, 2, 217–250. Reprinted in Kanner, L. (1973) Childhood Psychosis: Initial Studies and New Insights. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1987) Pretence and representation: the origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, C., Rutter, M. & Le Couteur, A. (1994) Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 659–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scaife, M. & Bruner, J. (1975) The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253, 265–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (1988) The role of joint-attentional processes in early language acquisition. Language Sciences, 10, 69–88.Google Scholar
Wing, L. (1976) Autistic Children. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Wing, L., Gould, J., Yeates, S. R., et al (1977) Symbolic play in severely mentally retarded and in autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, L. & Gould, J. (1979) Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: epidemiology and classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 11–29.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992) The Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD–10). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.