Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:07:42.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological Correlates of Behaviour in Seriously Delinquent Juveniles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

F. Patrick McKegney*
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.; National Training School for Boys, Washington, D.C.

Extract

Juvenile delinquency is generally considered to be one of present-day society's most serious problems. Indeed, more than half of all serious crimes in the United States are committed by youths under 18 years of age (3). Despite its magnitude and prevalence, juvenile delinquency is still inadequately defined, much less understood, partly because of its having only lately been recognized as a distinct practical problem and thus a fit matter for investigation. Over the past four decades, however, there has been an increasingly active study of the problem, focusing on the delinquent youths themselves and, more recently, on the environment in which they have developed. Methodological approaches to the question of definition and causality of delinquency have been diverse, but can be considered as being of two general types: the deductive-theoretical, in which a stated hypothesis is critically examined in the light of clinical experience as illustrated by clinical material; and, the inductive-empirical approach, in which a body of data, e.g., the environmental factors found in delinquents, is analysed, and conesions are drawn, based on the results of that aysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dahlstrom, W. G., and Welsh, G. S. (1960). An M.M.P.I. Handbook, p. 4951, Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
2. Dahlstrom, W. G., and Welsh, G. S. (1960), op. cit., p. 142.Google Scholar
3. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1962). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
4. Gibbens, T. C. N. (1963). Psychiatric Studies of Borstal Lads, pp. 163166. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
5. Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T. (1950). Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
6. Hathaway, S. R., and Monachesi, E. D. (1953). Analysing and Predicting Juvenile Delinquency with the M.M.P.I. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
7. Hewitt, L., and Jenkins, R. L. (1946). Fundamental Patterns of Maladjustment: The Dynamics of Their Origin. State of Illinois.Google Scholar
8. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
9. McKegney, F. P. (1965). “Baseline expectancy study for the National Training School for Boys.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Orthopsychiatric Association, March 1965.Google Scholar
10. McKegney, F. P. (1965). “An item analysis of the M.M.P.I. F Scale in juvenile delinquents.” Jour. clinical Psychology, 21, 201.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McQuitty, L. L. (1957). “Agreement analysis: classifying persons by predominant patterns of responses.” Brit. J. stat. Psychol., 9, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Marks, P. A., and Seeman, W. (1963). Actuarial Description of Abnormal Personality. 3342. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.