Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:42:15.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological Complications in Women Undergoing Voluntary Sterilization by Salpingectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Anand Bhushan Khorana
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College and S. S. G. Hospital, Baroda 390 001, India
Anirudh A. Vyas
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College and S. S. G. Hospital, Baroda 390 001, India

Summary

Five-hundred women electing salpingectomy for contraception and their husbands were studied by means of structured interviews and questionnaires over periods of three months to two years, beginning before surgery. The post-operative follow-up was completed for 374 couples. The subject's condition was compared before and after operation for emergence of any symptoms, and whether there was any significant difference in frequency of intercourse or other sexual behaviour, changes in sexual functioning, emotional adjustment and marital satisfaction. There was evidence of adverse psychological and sexual changes but these were apparently of a mild nature. Eighty-three per cent of the subjects complained of various symptoms, presumably of psychological origin; in 65 per cent sexual desire had declined, and 29 per cent had not resumed intercourse. The mean score of psychiatric symptoms based on clinical ratings rose from 0.38 before to 4.35 after operation, which is statistically highly significant. Paradoxically satisfaction with the operation was expressed by 92 per cent of the subjects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baroda District Family Planning bureau (1973) Family Planning Activities in Baroda District. District Panchayat, Baroda, India.Google Scholar
Dandekar, K. (1963) After effects of vasectomy. Arthe Vijnan. (Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics), Poona, India, 5, 212–24.Google Scholar
Fayette, M. (1972) Repercussions psychosomatiques de la stérilization chirurgicale féminine. Fertilité, Orthogénie, 4, 6772.Google Scholar
Ferber, A. A., Tietze, C. & Lewit, S. (1967) Men with vasectomies: a study of medical, sexual and psychosocial changes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 29, 354–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festinger, L. (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gandotra, M. M. & Das, M. (1972) After-Effects of Sterilisation. Patna University, India.Google Scholar
Garrison, P. L. & Gamble, C. J. (1950) Sexual effects of vasectomy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 144, 293–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuppuswamy, B. (1962) Manual of Socio-Economic Status Scal. (Urban). Manasayan, Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Landis, J. T. & Poffenberger, T. (1965) The marital and sexual adjustment of 330 couples who chose vasectomy as a form of birth control. Journal of Marriage and Family, 27, 57–8.Google Scholar
Lee, H. Y. (1966) Studies on vasectomy: III. Clinical studies on the influence of vasectomy. Korean Journal of Urology, 7, 1129.Google Scholar
Pareek, U. & Trivedi, G. (1964) Manual of Socio-Economic Status Scal. (Rural). Manasayan, Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Sawhney, N., Nathawat, S. S. & Sethi, B. B. (1970) A longitudinal study in family planning. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 12, 155–68.Google Scholar
Schwyhart, W. R. & Kutner, S. J. (1973) A reanalysis of female reactions to contraceptive sterilization. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 156, 354–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. H. (1950) Psychiatric study of Indian soldiers in the Arakan. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 23, 130–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, F. J., Rodgers, D. A., Cleveland, & Prentiss, R. J. (1969) Psychological response to vasectomy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21, 4654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.