Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:48:10.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dominance Hierarchies in Psychotherapy Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

James L. Kennedy  and
K. Roy MacKenzie
James L. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, USA
K. Roy MacKenzie*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary. Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For a social group to develop, two opposing adaptive processes must be reconciled—mechanisms for developing cohesion and mechanisms for establishing a dominance hierarchy. The formation of stable groups provides significant evolutionary advantages: a source of protection, increased reproductive opportunities, and a larger store of survival strategies than any one individual could encompass. A recent theory of human evolution (Reynolds, 1981) stresses that social behaviour would seem to be the most likely single cause of the origin of human intelligence, if one origin must be isolated. Current interest in the biological basis of behaviour has been focused particularly on specific diagnostic categories and biochemical mechanisms. This paper reviews a different research tradition, based on ethological principles, and applies the findings to an understanding of human group behaviour.

Type
Annotation
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 148 , Issue 6 , June 1986 , pp. 625 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkow, J. H. (1980) Prestige and self-esteem: a biosocial interpretation. In Dominance Relations (ed. Omark, D.). New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Beck, A. P. (1974) Phases in the development of structure in therapy and encounter groups. In Innovations in Client-centered Therapy (eds Wexler, D. A. & Rice, L. N.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bernstein, I. S., Gordon, T. P. & Rose, R. M. (1974) Factors influencing the expression of aggression during introductions to rhesus monkey groups. In Primate Aggression, Territoriality and Xenophobia (ed. Halloway, R. L.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buirski, P. (1980) Toward a theory of adaptation of analytic group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30, 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buirski, P., Plutchik, R. & Kellerman, H. (1978) Sex differences, dominance and personality in the chimpanzee. Animal Behavior, 26, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1975) Ethology: The Biology of Behavior (2nd edition). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, H. J. (1980) Playground as laboratory: Naturalistic studies of appeasement, altruism and the omega child. In Dominance Relations (ed. Omark, D.). New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Hausfater, G. (1975) Dominance and reproduction in baboons (Papio cynocephalus), a quantitative analysis. Contributions to primatology, 7, 20–68.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. (1971) Primate Societies. Chicago: Aldine & Atherton.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. A., Yalom, I. D. & Miles, M. B. (1973) Encounter Groups: First Facts. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K. R. (1983) The clinical application of a group climate measure. In Advances in Group Psychotherapy: Integrating Research and Practice (eds Dies, R. R. & MacKenzie, K. R.). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K. R. & Livesley, W. J. (1983) A developmental model for brief group therapy. In Advances in Group Psychotherapy: Integrating Research and Practice (eds Dies, R. R. & MacKenzie, K. R.). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
McGrew, W. C. (1972) An Ethological Study of Children's Behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, M. T. & Fairbanks, L. A. (eds.) (1977) Etiological Psychiatry. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. (1980) Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Price, J. (1967) The dominance hierarchy and the evolution of mental illness. Lancet, ii, 243–246.Google Scholar
Reynolds, V. (1981) The Biology of Human Action (2nd edition). San Fransisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. D. (1960) Bigotry in school children. Commentary, 29, 253–257.Google Scholar
Scheidlinger, S. (1980) Psycho-analytic Group Dynamics: Basic Readings. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.Google Scholar
Van Hooff, J. A. R. M. (1967) The facial display of the Catarrhine monkeys and apes. In Primate Ethology (ed. Morris, D.). London: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Van Lawick-Goodall, J. (1971) In the Shadow of Man. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Weisfeld, G. E., Omark, D. R., Cronin, C. L. (1980) A longitudinal and cross-sectional study of dominance in boys. In Dominance Relations (ed. Omark, D.). New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.