Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:56:06.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Foulds' Hierarchy Model of Psychiatric Illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Esen Gilleard
Esen Gilleard*
Affiliation:
24 Swanston Crescent, Edinburgh, EH10 7EL. (Formerly Senior Clinical Psychologist, York Health District)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In order to investigate the validity of Foulds' hierarchical model of psychiatric illness a cross-cultural study was carried out. The DSSI, a self-report symptom inventory, was administered to 100 English psychiatric patients and a translated version was administered to 100 Turkish psychiatric patients. The report of symptoms in both nationality groups conformed to Foulds' hierarchy principles in 93 per cent and 87 per cent of cases respectively.

When the reporting of symptoms within classes was investigated, nationality effects were observed to influence the self-reporting of ‘hysterical’ neurotic symptoms, irrespective of diagnostic class. Nationality was also observed to influence the reporting of ‘delusional’ symptoms, but in non-psychotic patients.

These results suggest that Foulds' model is a useful one in cross-cultural psychiatry, because it indicates both the universal features of hierarchical ordering of symptoms and the cultural influence on those symptoms which do not define the diagnostic class of the patient.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 142 , Issue 5 , May 1983 , pp. 518 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagshaw, V. E. (1977) A replication study of Foulds' and Bedford's hierarchical model of depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 53–5.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1976) The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. & Bedford, A. (1975) Hierarchy of classes of personal illness. Psychological Medicine, 5, 181–92.Google Scholar
Kiev, A. (1972) Transcultural Psychiatry. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lyketsos, G. C., Blackburn, I. M. & Mouzaki, D. (1979) Personality variables and dysthymic symptoms: a comparison between a Greek and a British sample. Psychological Medicine, 9, 753–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, F. M., Antram, M. C., Bagshaw, V. E. & Carmichael, S. K. (1977) A test of the hierarchical model of personal illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 56–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surtees, P. G. & Kendell, R. E. (1979) The hierarchy model of psychiatric symptomatology: an investigation based upon Present State Examination ratings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 438–43.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1971) International comparisons in the study of the functional psychoses. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 77–81.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (1973) The International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia, Vol 1. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.