Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:16:44.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Outcome after Psychosurgery using The Present State Examination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. A. Curson ,
T. Trauer ,
P. K. Bridges  and
P. K. Gillman
D. A. Curson
Affiliation:
St Andrew's Hospital, Northampton, NN1 5DG and Guy's Hospital Medical School, London
T. Trauer
Affiliation:
York Clinic, Guy's Hospital
P. K. Bridges
Affiliation:
Geoffrey Knight Psychosurgical Unit, Brook General Hospital, London and Department of Psychiatry, Guy's Hospital Medical School
P. K. Gillman
Affiliation:
Geoffrey Knight Psychosurgical Unit, Brook General Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of the study was to explore the way psychiatric symptoms might influence independent psychiatric assessment of outcome one year after stereotactic subcaudate tractotomy. In a sample of 34 patients consecutively accepted for psychosurgery the results showed that both ‘good’ and ‘poor’ outcome groups improved overall. No patients were significantly worse and the symptoms which improved most were nervous tension, depressed mood and somatic anxiety. It was not possible to identify symptomatic predictors of outcome because the preoperative symptom profiles of both groups were so similar. The reason why symptomatic outcome is so variable despite a basically identical psychosurgical technique is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 143 , Issue 2 , August 1983 , pp. 118 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foulds, G. A. (1965) The significance of Intra-individual diagnostic levels. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 761–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulds, G. A. (1966) The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Göktepe, E. O., Young, L. B. & Bridges, P. K. (1977) A further review of the results of stereotactic sub-caudate tractotomy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 270–80.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (1976) Neurosurgical treatment of psychiatric disorders. In Recent Advances in Clinical Psychiatry (ed. Granville-Grossman, K.). London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Knight, G. (1969) Bifrontal stereotactic tractotomy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 257–66.Google Scholar
Knights, A., Hirsch, S. R. & Platt, S. D. (1980) Clinical change as a function of brief admission to hospital in a controlled study using the Present State Examination. British Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 170–80.Google Scholar
Surtees, P. G. & Kendell, R. E. (1979) The hierarchy model of psychiatric symptomatology: An investigation based on Present State Examination rating. British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 438–43.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.