Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-20T06:14:14.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

After Wagner: Histories of Modernist Music Drama from Parsifal to Nono by Mark Berry. The Boydell Press, 2014. £55.00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Laura Tunbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOKS
Information
Tempo , Volume 69 , Issue 272 , April 2015 , pp. 88 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for instance, Koss, Juliet, Modernism after Wagner (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Daub, Adrian, Tristan's Shadow: Sexuality and the Total Work of Art After Wagner (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Downes, Stephen, After Mahler: Britten, Weill, Henze and Romantic Redemption (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The American journal Opera Quarterly has published numerous articles in recent years on stagings (including some by Norwegian director Stefan Herheim who Berry discusses at length).

2 For more on this see Harriet Boyd-Bennett's review of three Italian publications devoted to Nono, including his correspondence with Helmut Lachenmann and an edited anthology of documents and essays relating to Intolleranza 1960's premiere, forthcoming in the Journal of the Royal Musical Association.

3 Abbate, Carolyn, ‘Music – Drastic or Gnostic?’, Critical Inquiry 30:3 (2004), p. 505–36Google Scholar.