Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:54:06.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Britten's Revisionary Practice: Practical and Creative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Extract

Composers' revisions really fall into two main groups (though each group itself can be sub-divided many times over). The first group I should name ‘practical’, i.e., revisions or after-thoughts which are designed to make a work more viable; we constantly meet this kind of revising in the opera house, but I should also include under this heading those cases where a composer has written, say, a complete new movement to replace an existing one. More often than not, this is the revision of an early work; his intention is ‘practical’—to get rid of the one, perhaps feeble, movement that goes against the chances of the work's success and thus save what is worth preserving in the rest of the work. This is what we might call good husbandry on the part of the composer. He keeps his crops, so to speak, in the best and most marketable condition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)