Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:56:22.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zodiacal Dust Bands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

S. F. Dermott
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A E-mail [email protected]
D. D. Durda
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A E-mail [email protected]
B. A. S. Gustafson
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A E-mail [email protected]
S. Jayaraman
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A E-mail [email protected]
J. C. Liou
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A E-mail [email protected]
Y. L. XU
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the outstanding problems in solar system science is the source of the particles that constitute the zodiacal cloud. The zodiacal dust bands discovered by IRAS have a pivotal role in this debate because, without doubt, they are the small, tail end products of asteroidal collisions. Geometrical arguments are probably the strongest and the plane of symmetry of the dust bands places their source firmly in the asteroid belt. A cometary source, Comet Encke for example, could exist at the distance of the mainbelt, but the dynamics of cometary orbits makes the formation of cometary dust bands impossible, unless, of course, there is a significant (comparable in volume to the asteroidal families) source of comets interior to the orbit of Jupiter with low (asteroidal) orbital eccentricities. We have suggested that the dust bands are associated with the prominent asteroidal families. The link with the Themis and Koronis families is good but the link with Eos remains to be proved. We show here by detailed modeling that even though the filtered infrared flux in the 25μm waveband associated with the dust bands is only ~1% of the total signal, this is only the “tip of the iceberg” and that asteroidal dust associated with the bands constitutes ~10% of the zodiacal cloud. This result, plus the observed size-frequency distribution of mainbelt asteroids and the observed ratio of the number of family to non-family asteroids allows us to estimate that asteroidal dust accounts for about one third of the zodiacal cloud. The discovery of the “leading-trailing” asymmetry of the zodiacal cloud in the IRAS data and our interpretation of this asymmetry in terms of a ring of asteroidal particles in resonant lock with the Earth is important for two reasons. (1) The existence of the ring strongly suggests that large (diameter ≥ 12μm) asteroidal particles (or particles with low orbital eccentricities) are transported to the inner solar system by drag forces. (2) The observed ratio of the trailing-leading asymmetry allows an independent estimate of the contribution of asteroidal particles to the zodiacal cloud. These new results have important implications for the source of the interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) collected at the Earth. Because asteroidal particles constitute about one third of the zodiacal cloud and are transported to the inner solar system by drag forces, gravitational focussing by the Earth that results in the preferential capture of particles from orbits with low inclinations and low eccentricities and the possible “funneling” effect of the ring itself, imply that nearly all of the unmelted IDPs collected at the Earth are asteroidal.

Type
Populations of Small Bodies
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Dermott, S.F., Nicholson, P.D., Burns, J.A., and Houck, J.R.: 1984, “Origin of solar system dustbands discovered by IRAS”. Nature, 312, 505509.Google Scholar
Dermott, S.F., Nicholson, P.D., Burns, J.A., and Houck, J.R.: 1985, “An analysis of the Solar System Dust Bands”. In Properties and Interaction of Interplanetary Dust (Giese, R.H., Lamy, P., Eds.), 395409, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Dermott, S.F., Nicholson, P.D., and Wolven, B.: 1986, “Preliminary Analysis of the IRAS Solar System Dust Bands”. In Asteroids Comets and Meteors II (Lagerkvist, C-I. Lindblad, B. A., Lundstedt, H., Rickman, H., Eds.), 583594, Uppsala Universitet Reprocentralen.Google Scholar
Dermott, S.F., Nicholson, P.D., Kim, Y., Wolven, B., and Tedesco, E.F.: 1988, “The impact of IRAS on Asteroidal Science”. In Comets to Cosmology (Lawrence, A., Ed.), 318, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Dermott, S.F., and Nicholson, P.D.: 1989, “IRAS Dustbands and the origin of the Zodiacal Cloud”. Highlights of Astronomy, 8, 259266.Google Scholar
Dermott, S.F., Nicholson, P.D., Gomes, R.S. and Malhotra, R.: 1990, “Modelling the IRAS solar system dustbands”. Adv. Space Res., 10, 165172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dermott, S. F., et al: 1992: “Dynamics of the Zodiacal Cloud”. In Chaos, Resonance, and Collective Dynamical Phenomena in the Solar System (Ferraz-Mello, S., Ed.), 333347, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Dermott, S. F., et al.: 1993, “The Origin of IRAS Dustbands”. In Meteroids and Their Parent Bodies (Stohl, J., Williams, I. P. Eds.), 357366, Astronomical Inst., Slovak. Acad. Sci., Bratislava.Google Scholar
Dermott, S.F., Jayaraman, S., Xu, Y.L. and Liou, J.C.: 1994, “IRAS observations of a ring around the sun: Asteroidal particles in resonant lock with the Earth”. Nature, (submitted).Google Scholar
Deul, E.R., and Walker, H.J.: 1989, “Responsivity variations in the IRAS survey”. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser., 81, 207214.Google Scholar
Divine, N.: 1993, “Five Populations of Interplanetary Meteoroids”. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 1702917048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohnayi, J.S.: 1969, “Collisional model of asteroids and their debris”. J. Geophys. Res., 74, 25312554.Google Scholar
Durda, D.D.: 1993, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Flynn, G.J.: 1989, “Atmospheric entry heating: A criterion to distinguish between asteroidal and planetary sources of dust”. Icarus, 77, 287310.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. M.: 1991, “The Interplanetary medium is thriving”. In Origin and Evolution of Interplanetary Dust (Levasseur-Regourd, A. C., Hasegawa, H. Eds.), 443451, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Grün, E., Zook, H. A., Fechtig, H., and Giese, R.H.: 1985, “Collisional balance of the meteoritic complex”. Icarus, 62, 244272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grün, E., Fechtig, H. and Kissel, J.: 1985, “Orbits of Interplanteray dust particles insider 1AU as observed by Helios”. In Properties and Interactions of Interplanetary dust (Giese, R., Lamy, P., Eds.), 101111, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Grün, E., et al: 1992, “Galileo and Ulysses dust measurements: From Venus to Jupiter”. Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 13111314.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. G.: 1988, “Models for infrared emission from Zodiacal Dust”. In Comets to Cosmology (Lawrence, A. Ed.), 2739, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Jackson, A.A. and Zook, H.A.: 1989, “A Solar System dust ring with the Earth as its shepherd”. Nature, 337, 629631.Google Scholar
Jackson, A.A. and Zook, H.A.: 1992, “Orbital Evolution of Dust particles from Comets and Asteroids”. Icarus, 97, 7084.Google Scholar
Leinert, C., Hanner, M., Ritcher, I. and Pitz, E.: 1980, “The plane of symmetry of the interplanetary dust in the inner solar system”. Astron. Astrophys., 82, 328336.Google Scholar
Leinert, C. and Gr$uTn, E.: 1990, “Interplanetary Dust”. In Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I (Schwenn, R., Marsch, E., Eds.) 207275, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., Renard, J.B. and Dumont, R.: 1991, “The Zodiacal cloud complex”. In Origin and Evolution of Interplanetary Dust (Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., Hasegawa, H., Eds.), 131138, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, J.C.: 1993, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Low, F.J., et al. : 1984, “Infrared cirrcus: New components of the extended infrared emission”. Astrophys. J. Lett. 278, L19L22.Google Scholar
Opik, E.J.: 1951, “Collision probabilities with the planets and the distribution of interplanetary dust”. In Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., 54, Sect A, 165199.Google Scholar
Reach, W.T.: 1991, “Zodiacal Emission II. Dust near ecliptic”. Astrophys. J., 369, 529543.Google Scholar
Reach, W.T.: 1992, “Zodiacal Emission III. Dust near Asteroid Belt”. Astrophys. J., 392, 289299.Google Scholar
Röser, S. and Staude, H.J.: 1978, “The zodiacal light from 1500 Åto 60 micron”. Astron. Astrophys., 67, 381394.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K.: 1991, “The annual variation of radio meteor echoes observed from 1981 to 1985”. In Origin and Evolution of Interplanetary Dust (Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., Hasegawa, H., Eds.), 319322, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Sykes, M.V., Greenberg, R., Dermott, S.F., Nicholson, P.D., Burns, J.A. and Gautier, T.N.: 1989, “Dust Bands in the Asteroid Belt”. In Asteroids II (Binzel, R., Gehrels, T., Matthews, M.S., Eds), 336367, Univ. of Arizona Press., Tucson.Google Scholar
Sykes, M.V. and Walker, R.G: 1992, “Cometary Dust Trails”. Icarus, 95, 180200.Google Scholar
Zappalà, V., Cellino, A. Farinella, P. and Knežević, Z.: 1990, “Asteroid Families I. Identification by hierarchial clustering and reliability assessment”. Astron. J., 100, 20302046.Google Scholar
Zappalà, V., Cellino, A. Farinella, P. and Milani, A.: 1994, “Asteroid Families II. Extended emission to unnumbered multiopposition asteroids”. Astron. J., 107, 772801.Google Scholar