Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T18:40:13.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Praesepe for the Definition of the Lower Part of the Zero-Age Main Sequence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

M. Golay
M. Golay*
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Geneve

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an attempt to determine the Hyades distance (Golay, 1973), it was assumed that stars of the same “photometric 0m.01 box” (see Golay, 1977a) have the same visual absolute magnitude. The large amount of photometric data in the UBV B1B2V1G photometric system allows a discussion on this hypothesis (Golay, 1977b). We have 60 “photometric 0m.01 boxes”, each containing a central star of known trigonometric parallax and at least one Praesepe star. We select the 16 boxes (Table I) containing single stars or binaries with an estimated mass ratio, a relative probable error < 30% for the parallaxes and a standard deviation for colors <0m.007. The UBV B1B2V1G colors, the indices (B-V), (B2-V1) and the magnitude mV are taken from the Second Catalogue (Rufener, 1976) and the internal catalogue of the Geneva Observatory. The color index (B-V) is taken from Johnson (1952, 1957), Johnson and Knuckles (1955), the trigonometric parallax from Jenkins (1952, 1963) and Gliese (1969) and the spectral type for Hyades stars from Morgan and Hiltner (1965). The listings of all 0m.01 photometric star boxes in the UBV B1B2V1G system are given by Golay (1977c). The parallax obtained for Praesepe is π(0″.001) = 6.175 ± p.e. 0.1, i.e. a distance modulus (m-M) = 6m.05 and a distance of 162 parsecs. Golay (1977c) published the differences of the distance moduli for pairs of clusters having stars in the same box. The distances of these clusters is given in Table III, assuming a distance of 162 pc for Praesepe. The accuracy of this method is independent of both the distance magnitude and the chemical composition of the stars of a cluster since the stars have to be in the same box as a star with a known trigonometric parallax. The main sequence of Praesepe and a sample of Hyades stars, in the same photometric box with a Praesepe star is given in Table II. The depth effect in Praesepe being very small, the main sequence is very thin and the main sequence fitting procedure is better starting from Praesepe than from the Hyades.

Type
Part VI: Galaxies and Miscellaneous Subjects
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 80: The HR Diagram , 1978 , pp. 277 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1978 

References

Bueren, H.G. van (1952). Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 11, 385.Google Scholar
Gliese, W. (1969). Veröffentl. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heidelberg No.22.Google Scholar
Golay, M. (1973). IAU Symposium No. 54, Problems of Calibration of Absolute Magnitudes and Temperature of Stars, Hauck, B. and Westerlund, B. E., eds., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golay, M. (1977a). Astron. Astrophys. 60, 181.Google Scholar
Golay, M. (1977b). Astron. Astrophys. in press.Google Scholar
Golay, M. (1977c). Publ. Obs. Genève Serie B, No. 3 and 4.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.F. (1952). General Catalogue of Trigonometric Parallaxes, Yale Univ. Obs. Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.F. (1963). Suppl. to the General Catalogue, Yale Univ. Obs. Google Scholar
Johnson, H.L. (1952). Astrophys. J. 116, 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H.L., Knuckles, C.F. (1955). Astrophys. J. 122, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H.L. (1957). Astrophys. J. 126, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein-Wassink, W.J. (1927). Publ. Kapteyn Astron. Lab. No 41.Google Scholar
Morgan, W.W., Hiltner, W.A. (1965). Astrophys. J. 141, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufener, F. (1976). Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 26, 275.Google Scholar