Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:21:20.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UCH II regions in extragalactic clusters and associations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Kelsey E. Johnson
Kelsey E. Johnson*
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 0, Socorro, NM87801, USA and Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin, 475 N. Charter Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years, a number of extragalactic massive stars clusters have been detected which are still deeply embedded in their birth material In many cases, these clusters are only visible in the mid-IR to radio regimes, and have typically been detected as ‘inverted’ spectrum radio sources. These clusters appear to have properties which are analogous to those of ultracompact H ii (UCH ii) regions in the Galaxy, albeit vastly scaled up in total mass and luminosity. The ultra-young clusters appear to form with a continuum of masses, and the most massive are consistent with being the progenitors of globular clusters. Here I will overview the properties of the currently known sample of ultradense H ii (UDH ii) regions and examine their relation to Galactic UCH ii regions.

Type
Part 3. Location and Distribution of Massive Stars
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 212: A Massive Star Odyssey: From Main Sequence to Supernova , 2003 , pp. 474 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2003 

References

De Pree, C.G., Mehringer, D.M., Goss, W.M. 1997, ApJ 482, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, B.G., Efremov, Y.N. 1997, ApJ 480, 235.Google Scholar
Gorjian, V., Turner, J.L., Beck, S.C. 2001, ApJ 554, 29.Google Scholar
Johnson, K.E., Kobulnicky, H.A., Massey, P., Conti, P.S. 2001, ApJ 559, 864.Google Scholar
Kobulnicky, H.A., Johnson, K.E. 1999, ApJ 527, 154.Google Scholar
Mezger, P.G., Schraml, J., Terzian, Y. 1967, ApJ 150, 807.Google Scholar
Neff, S.G., Ulvestad, J.S. 2000, AJ 120, 670.Google Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E., Dicke, R.H. 1968, ApJ 154, 891.Google Scholar
Tarchi, A., Neininger, N., Greve, A., et al. 2000, A&A 358, 95.Google Scholar
Turner, J.L., Ho, P.T.P., Beck, S.C. 1998, AJ 116, 1212.Google Scholar
Vacca, W.D., Johnson, K.E., Conti, P.S. 2002, AJ 123, 772.Google Scholar
Vacca, W.D. 1994, ApJ 421, 140.Google Scholar
Wood, D.O., Churchwell, E. 1989, ApJS 69, 831.Google Scholar