Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T08:29:33.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Three-dimensional Outer-magnetospheric Gap Model for Gamma-ray Pulsars: I. The Crab Pulsar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

K. S. Cheng ,
M. Ruderman  and
L. Zhang
K. S. Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, the University of Hong Kong, P.R. China
M. Ruderman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Columbia University, U.S.A.
L. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, the University of Hong Kong, P.R. China

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We use a three-dimensional pulsar magnetosphere model to study the geometry of outer-magnetospheric gaps. The vertical size of the “outer gap” is first determined by a self-consistent model in which the outer gap size is limited by pair production from collisions between (1) thermal photons produced from polar cap heating by backflow “outer gap” current, and (2) the curvature photons emitted by gap-accelerated charged particles. The transverse size of the outer gap is also determined by local pair production limits. In principle, there are two topologically disconnected outer gaps in the magnetosphere of a pulsar. Both incoming and outgoing particle flows are allowed. However, the emission morphologies produced by incoming particle flow is severely restricted by local pair production in the gap and the absorption of magnetic pair production near the star. Double-peaked light curves with strong bridges are most common. From the three-dimensional structure of the outer gap and its local properties, we calculate the emission morphologies and phase-resolved spectra of gamma-ray pulsars. Applications to the Crab pulsar illustrate the model.

Type
Part I: Talks
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 195: Highly Energetic Physical Processes and Mechanisms , 2000 , pp. 223 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000 

References

Cheng, K. S., Gil, J., & Zhang, L. 1998, ApJ, 493, L35.Google Scholar
Cheng, K. S., Ho, C., & Ruderman, M.A. 1986a, ApJ, 300, 500 (CHR I).Google Scholar
Cheng, K. S., Ho, C., & Ruderman, M.A. 1986b, ApJ, 300, 522 (CHR II).Google Scholar
Cheng, A. F., Ruderman, M. A., & Sutherland, P.G. 1976, ApJ, 203, 209.Google Scholar
Cheng, K. S., & Zhang, L. 1999, ApJ, 515, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, J., & Romani, R.W. 1992, ApJ, 400, 724.Google Scholar
Chiang, J., & Romani, R.W. 1994, ApJ, 436, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierro, J. M. 1995, , .Google Scholar
Fierro, J. M., Michelson, M., Nolan, P. L., & Thomson, D. J. 1998, ApJ, 494, 734.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. P., & Ruderman, M. 1993, ApJ, 415, 286.Google Scholar
Holloway, N. J. 1973, Nature Physical Science, 246, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romani, R. W. 1996, ApJ, 470, 469.Google Scholar
Romani, R. W., & Yadigaroglu, I.-A. 1995, ApJ, 438, 314.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J., et al. 1996, ApJ, 465, 385.Google Scholar
Ulmer, M. P., et al. 1995, ApJ, 448, 356.Google Scholar
Wang, F. Y.-H., Ruderman, M., Halpern, J. P., & Zhu, T. 1998, ApJ, 498, 373.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., & Cheng, K. S. 1997, ApJ, 487, 370.Google Scholar
Zhu, T., & Ruderman, M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 701.Google Scholar