Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T12:08:33.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theoretical MHD Model for Extragalactic Jets and its Comparison with the Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

P. Pietrini
P. Pietrini*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Space Science L. E. Fermi 5 50125 Firenze Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two aspects of the MHD stationary equilibrium model developed by Chiuderi et al.(1989) to describe extragalactic jets are analyzed and compared with the observational constraints: the global energy flux convected by the cylindrical jet and the ranges of the equilibrium parameters allowed by the stability analysis. In particular, the results obtained from the temporal stability analysis are converted into a spatial point of view. In this context, it is easier to find essentially “stable” equilibrium configurations for shorter jets. In conclusion, the fundamental hypotheses of this model (like thermal confinement and substantial equipartition among the various forms of energy considered) are such that the model turns out to be suitable for the description of class I jets, associated with rather low-power radio sources.

Type
8. The Role of Magnetic Fields in Radio Source Jets and Extended Radio Lobes
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 140: Galactic and Intergalactic Magnetic Fields , 1990 , pp. 441 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1990 

References

1. Chiuderi, C., Pietrini, P., and Torricelli-Ciamponi, G. 1989, Ap. J. , 339,70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Torricelli-Ciamponi, G. and Pietrini, P. 1989, submitted to Ap. J. Google Scholar
3. Corbelli, E., and Veltri, P. 1989, Ap. J. , in press.Google Scholar
4. Pietrini, P., and Torricelli-Ciamponi, G. 1989, Phys. Fluids B: Plasma Phys. , 1,923.Google Scholar
5. Corbelli, E., and Torricelli-Ciamponi, G. 1989, submitted to Phys. Fluids.Google Scholar
6. Bridle, A.H. 1986, Can. Jour. Phys. , 64, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Prestage, R.M., and Peacock, J.A. 1988, M.N.R.A.S. , 230, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rosenbluth, M.N., Dagazian, R.Y., and Rutherford, P.H. 1973, Phys. Fluids , 16, 1894.Google Scholar