Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T07:42:58.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stellar Associations in the Tail of NGC 4038

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

I. Saviane
Affiliation:
ESO, 3107 Alonso de Cordova, Vitacura - Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
J. E. Hibbard
Affiliation:
NRAO, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
R. M. Rich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, UCLA, Math-Sciences 8979, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have used the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 to image the putative tidal dwarf galaxy located at the tip of the Southern tidal tail of NGC 4038/9, the Antennae. We resolve individual stars, and identify two stellar populations. Hundreds of massive stars are present, concentrated into tight OB associations on scales of 200 pc, with ages ranging from 2-100 Myr. An older stellar population is distributed roughly following the outer contours of the neutral hydrogen in the tidal tail; we associate these stars with material ejected from the outer disks of the two spirals. The older stellar population has a red giant branch tip at I = 26.5 ± 0.2 from which we derive a distance modulus (m - M)0 = 30.7 ± 0.25. The implied distance of 13.8 ± 1.7 Mpc is nearly a factor of two closer than commonly quoted distances for NGC 4038/9. In contrast to the previously studied core of the merger, we find no super star clusters. One might conclude that SSCs require the higher pressures found in the central regions in order to form, while spontaneous star formation in the tail produces the kind of O-B star associations seen in dwarf irregular galaxies.

Type
Part 4. Recycling
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Barnes, J.E., & Hernquist, L. 1992, Nature, 360, 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duc, R-A., Mirabel, I.F. 1998, A&A, 333, 813.Google Scholar
Duc, R-A., Brinks, E., Wink, J.E., & Mirabel, I.F. 1997, A&A, 326, 537.Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G., & Efremov, Y. N. 1997, ApJ, 480, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbard, J. E., van der Hulst, J. M., Barnes, J. E., & Rich, R. M. 2001, AJ, 122, 2969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jog, C. J., & Das, M. 1996, ApJ, 473, 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirabel, I.F., Dottori, H., & Lutz, D. 1992, A&A, 256, L19.Google Scholar
Schweizer, F. 1978, in Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies, eds. Berkhuijsen, E. M. and Wielebinski, R. (Dordrecht, Reidel), p. 279 (S78).Google Scholar
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, B.C., Zhang, Q., Leitherer, C., Fall, S. M., Schweizer, F., & Miller, B.W. 1999, AJ, 118, 1551 Zwicky, F. 1956, Ergebnisse der Exakten Naturwissenschaften, 29, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar