Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T04:41:50.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical Properties of Extrasolar Planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

R. Paul Butler ,
Geoffrey W. Marcy ,
Debra A. Fischer ,
Steven S. Vogt ,
C. G. Tinney ,
Hugh R. A. Jones ,
Alan J. Penny  and
Kevin Apps
R. Paul Butler
Affiliation:
Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Inst. of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd, NW, Washington DC, 20015-1305 USA
Geoffrey W. Marcy
Affiliation:
Astronomy Dept., University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Debra A. Fischer
Affiliation:
Astronomy Dept., University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Steven S. Vogt
Affiliation:
UCO/Lick Observatories, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
C. G. Tinney
Affiliation:
Anglo-Australian Observatory, P.O. Box 296, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia
Hugh R. A. Jones
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD, UK
Alan J. Penny
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, 0×11 0QX, UK
Kevin Apps
Affiliation:
Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The emerging statistical properties from the first 50 extrasolar planets are startlingly different from the picture that was imagined prior to 1995. About 0.75% of nearby solar type stars harbor jovian planets in 3 to 5 day circular orbits. Another ∽7% of stars have jupiter–mass companions orbiting in eccentric orbits within 3.5 AU. The mass distribution of substellar companions rises abruptly near 5 MJup and continues increasing down to the detection limit near 1 MJup-Orbital eccentricities correlate positively with semimajor axes, even for planets beyond the tidal circularization zone within 0.1 AU, distinguishing planets from binary stars. The planet bearing stars are metal–rich relative to both nearby stars and to the Sun. Analogs of Solar System planets have not been detected to date as they require precision of 3 m s−1 maintained for more than a decade.

Type
Part I: Discovery and study of extrasolar planets - current
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 202: Planetary Systems in the Universe – Observation, Formation and Evolution , 2004 , pp. 3 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Artymowicz, P. 1993, ApJ, 419, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedding, T. R., Butler, R. P., Kjeldsen, H., Baldry, I. K., O'Toole, S. J., Tinney, C. G., Marcy, G. W., Kienzle, F., & Carrier, F. 2000, ApJ, submitted.Google Scholar
Boss, A.P. 2000, ApJ, 536, L101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boss, A.P. 1995, Science, 267, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., McCarthy, C., Dosanjh, P., & Vogt, S. S. 1996, PASP, 108, 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, R. P., & Marcy, G. W. 1997, Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Planets, ed. Rebolo, R., Martin, E.L. & Zapatero Osorio, M.R., ASP Conference Series, 134, 162.Google Scholar
Butler, R. P., Vogt, S.S., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Henry, G.W. & Apps, K. 2000, ApJ, 544, in press.Google Scholar
Butler, R. P., Tinney, C. G., Marcy, G. W., Jones, H. R. A., Penny, A. J. & Apps, K. 2000, ApJ, submitted.Google Scholar
de la Fuente Marcos, C., & de la Fuente Marcos, R. 1997, A&A, 326, L21.Google Scholar
Holman, M., Touma, J., & Tremaine, S. 1997, Nature, 386, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, G., & Adams, F. C. 1998, ApJ, 508, L171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levison, H. F., Lissauer, J. J., & Duncan, M. J. 1998, AJ, 116, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. 1996, Nature, 380, 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissauer, J. J. 1995, Icarus, 114, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P. Williams, E., Bildsten, L., Graham, J. R., Ghez, A. M., Jernigan, J. G. 1997, ApJ, 481, 926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, G.W., Butler, R.P., Vogt, S.S., Fischer, D.A., Lissauer, J. 1998, ApJ, 505, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S. 2000, ApJ, 536, L43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perryman, M. A. C., et al. 1997, A&A, 323, L49.Google Scholar
Rasio, F. A., & Ford, E. B. 1996, Science, 274, 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saar, S. H., Butler, R. P., & Marcy, G. W. 1998, ApJ, 498, L153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinney, C. G., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Jones, H. R. A., Penny, A. J., Vogt, S. S., Apps, K., & Henry, G. W. 2000, ApJ, in press.Google Scholar
Vogt, S. S., Marcy, G. W., & Butler, R. P., Apps, K. 2000, ApJ, 536, 902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidenschilling, S.J., & Marzari, F. 1996, Nature, 384, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar