Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:17:41.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Standard Stars for the Comparison of Methods of Diameter Determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

L. Pastori
Affiliation:
1Astronomical Observatory of Milano-Merate
L. E. Pasinetti
Affiliation:
2Department of Physics, University of Milan
E. Antonello
Affiliation:
1Astronomical Observatory of Milano-Merate
G. Malaspina
Affiliation:
1Astronomical Observatory of Milano-Merate

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fracassini, et al. (1983) suggested a preliminary list of stars suitable for use as standards for methods of determination of stellar apparent diameters and absolute radii. According to their criteria, only stars with at least three methods of determination were considered; moreover, only if the percentage error of the data was <10% were they considered as “standards”. This simple statement is not completely satisfactory, because of some ambiguous cases. For instance, the interferometric method (code 1), Wesselink's method (6H) and Barnes and Evans' (6G) method are not independent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985 

References

Fracassini, M., Pasinetti, L. E. and Manzolini, F. 1981, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 45, 145.Google Scholar
Fracassini, M., Pasinetti, L. E., and Valentini, B. 1983, Inform. Bull. CDS, (Strasbourg), 24, 31.Google Scholar
Hoffleit, D. and Jaschek, C. 1982, Catalogue of Bright Stars (Yale U. Obs., New Haven).Google Scholar
Pastori, L., Pasinetti, L. E. and Antonello, E. 1985, in IAU Symposium No. 111: Calibration of Fundamental Stellar Quantities, ed. Hayes, D. S., Pasinetti, L. E. and Davis Philip, A. G. (Reidel, Dordrecht), p. 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar