Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T06:39:43.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Space observations of solar and stellar oscillations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Robert W. Noyes
Robert W. Noyes*
Affiliation:
Havard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Space observations offer many advantages for helio- and asteroseismology, due principally to the absence in space of transparency fluctuations, image blurring, and absorption by the Earth's atmosphere, and to the possibility of long-term continuous observations by a single spaceborne instrument. Helioseismology from space has already shown that stars produce a measurable oscillation signal through photometric variations at the micromagnitude level; this leads to the near-term possibility of simple spaceborne instruments for both helio- and asteroseismology. For the Sun, where photon flux is not a serious problem, doppler analyzer instruments also show great promise. A number of space investigations in helio- and asteroseismology presently under definition or development are briefly discussed.

Type
Chapter 10: Network and Space Observations of Solar and Stellar Oscillations
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 123: Advances In Hello- and Asteroseismology , 1988 , pp. 527 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Domingo, V. 1986, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Fossat, E. 1986, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, 1986, personal communicaton; see also “SOHO: Report on the Phase A Study,” ESA Report SCI(85) 7, 1985, p. 71.Google Scholar
Harvey, J.W. 1985, in “Future Missions in Solar, Heliospheric, and Space Plasma Physics” (ESA SP-235), p. 199.Google Scholar
Harvey, J.W. 1986, these proceedings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyng, P. 1986, personal communication; see also “SOHO: Report on the Phase A Study,” ESA Report SCI(85) 7, 1985, p. 70.Google Scholar
Hudson, H., Brown, T., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cox, A.N., Demarque, P., Harvey, J., McGraw, J., Noyes, R., 1986, Concept Study Proposal for an Asteroseismology Explorer, Univ. Calif. San Diego.Google Scholar
Noyes, R.W. and Rhodes, E.J., (eds.) 1984, Report of NASA Science Working Group on the Study of Solar Oscillations from Space,” NASA, JPL.Google Scholar
Praderie, F., Mangeney, A., Lemaire, Ph., Puget, P. 1986, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Rhodes, E., Cacciani, A., Tomczyk, S., Ulrich, R., Blamont, J., Howard, R., Dumont, P., and Smith, E. 1984, in Advances in Space Research, 4, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, E., Tomczyk, S., and Cacciani, A. 1986, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Soderblom, D. 1986, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Willson, R.C. 1979, App. Optics, 18, 179.Google Scholar
Willson, R.C. and Hudson, H.S. 1981, Astrophys. J., 244, L185.Google Scholar
Woodard, M.F. and Noyes, R.W. 1985, Nature, 318, p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, M.F. and Noyes, R.W. 1986, these proceedings.Google Scholar