Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:38:20.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Astronomical Fourier Transform Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

J. P. Maillard
J. P. Maillard*
Affiliation:
Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Bld Arago, 75014 Paris (France)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The multiplex properties of the Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) can be considered as disadvantageous with modern detectors and large telescopes, the dominant noise source being no longer in most applications the detector noise. Nevertheless, a FTS offers a gain in information and other instrumental features remain: flexibility in choosing resolving power up to very high values, large throughput, essential in high–resolution spectroscopy with large telescopes, metrologic accuracy, automatic substraction of parasitic background. The signal–to–noise ratio in spectra can also be improved: by limiting the bandwidth with cold filters or even cold dispersers, by matching the instrument to low background foreoptics and high–image quality telescopes. The association with array detectors provides the solution for the FTS to regain its full multiplex advantage.

Type
I. Spectrographs, Detectors, Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, and Radial Velocities
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 132: The Impact of Veryhigh S/N Spectroscopy on Stellar Physics , 1988 , pp. 71 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1988 

References

de Bergh, C., 6th International Conference on Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Vienna 24–28 Aug 1987; proceedings to be published in Micro Chemica Acta (Springer Verlag Pub. Co.).Google Scholar
Brault, J.W., 1979, Ossni. Mem. Oss. Astofis. Arcetri, 106, 33.Google Scholar
Davis, D.S., Larson, H.P., Williams, M., Michel, G., Connes, P., 1980, Applied Optics, 19, 4138.Google Scholar
Diego, F., 1985, Pub. A.S.P., 97, 1209.Google Scholar
Hall, D.N.B., Ridgway, S.T., Bell, E.A., Yarborough, J.M., 1979, SPIE, 172, Instrumentation in Astronomy III, p.121.Google Scholar
Hall, D.N.B., 1986, Imaging Michelson Spectrometer for Space Telescope, U. of Hawaii Institut for Astronomy, Jet Propulsion Laboratory.Google Scholar
Jennings, D.E., Deming, D., Wiedemann, G.R., Kedy, J.J., 1986, Ap. J. (Letters), 310, L39 Google Scholar
Maillard, J.P. and Michel, G., 1982, in Instrumentation for Astronomy with Large Optical Telescopes, IAU Colloquium No 67, Humphries, C. M. (ed) p. 213, D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Maillard, J.P. and Nadeau, D., 1988, in The Impact of very high S/N Spectroscopy on Stellar Physics, IAU Colloquium No 132, Meudon 29 June–July 1987.Google Scholar
Persson, S.E., Geballe, T.R., McGregor, P.J., Edwards, S., Lonsdale, C.J., 1983, Ap. J., 286, 289.Google Scholar
Ridgway, S.T. and Brault, J.W., 1984, Ann. Rev. Astrophys., 22, 291.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M., Yamashita, T., Satos, S., Okuda, H., 1985, Pub. A.S.P., 97, 1209.Google Scholar
Wade, R., 1983, SPIE, 445, 47.Google Scholar