Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:19:08.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Search for short-time periodic variations among WR+C binaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

S.V. Marchenko
Affiliation:
1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. A, Montreal, Québec, H3C 337 Canada, and Observatoire du mont Mégantic
I.I. Antokhin
Affiliation:
2 Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universitetskij Prospect 13, 117234, Moscow, Russia
J.-F. Bertrand
Affiliation:
1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. A, Montreal, Québec, H3C 337 Canada, and Observatoire du mont Mégantic
R. Lamontagne
Affiliation:
1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. A, Montreal, Québec, H3C 337 Canada, and Observatoire du mont Mégantic
A.F.J. Moffat
Affiliation:
1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. A, Montreal, Québec, H3C 337 Canada, and Observatoire du mont Mégantic
A. Piceno
Affiliation:
3 Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electrónica, Apdos. Postales 216 y 51, Puebla 72000, Pue., México
J.M. Matthews
Affiliation:
4 Department of Geophysics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 129—2219 Main Mall, Vancouver, EC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the 1992–1993 observing season, WR3, 6, 16, 40, 66, 82 and 134 were monitored in fast photometry mode with time-resolution 0.005—0.01 s. Only WR6 reveals a possible period of P = 0.11 s (semi-amplitude A = 0.025 mag), which is close to the derived equilibrium period of a new-born pulsar in a binary system after the rapid phase of Roche Lobe Over-Flow from the original secondary component.

Type
Session VIII - poster summaries
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1995 

References

Antokhin, I.I., Aslanov, A.A., Cherepashchuk, A.M. 1982, Sov. Astron. (Letters) 8, 156 Google Scholar
Bendat, J.S., Piersol, A.G. 1986, Random Data Analysis and Measurement Procedures, (New York: Wiley)Google Scholar
Jeffers, S., Stiff, T., Weller, W.G. 1985, AJ 90, 1852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamontagne, R., Moffat, A.F.J. 1986, A&A 162, 114 Google Scholar
Lamontagne, R., Moffat, A.F.J. 1987, AJ 94, 1008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, H., Lunström, I., Stenholm, B. 1975, A&A 44, 219 Google Scholar
Marchenko, S.V., Antokhin, I.I., Bertrand, J.-Fr., Lamontagne, R., Moffat, A.F. J., Piceno, A., Matthews, J.M. 1994, AJ 108, 678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J., Haupt, W. 1974, A&A 32, 435 Google Scholar
Sturrock, P.A., Petrosian, V., Turk, J.S. 1975, ApJ 196, 73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1977, in: Papagiannis, M.D. (eds.), 8th Texas Symp. on Relativistic Astrophysics, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 302, 14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhilyaev, B.E., Romanuk, Ya.O., Svyatogorov, O.A. 1991, Kinem. Phys. Celest. Bodies 7, 48 Google Scholar