Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:50:45.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of rotation and mass loss in the evolution of massive stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

André Maeder  and
Georges Meynet
André Maeder
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, CH-1290 Sauverny, la Suisse
Georges Meynet
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, CH-1290 Sauverny, la Suisse

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Rotation affects all the outputs of the evolution and nucleosynthesis of massive stars. We discuss the evolution of the rotational velocities, the internal ω-gradients, the tracks in the H-R diagram, the age determinations, the evolution of the surface N/C abundance ratios, the B/R number ratios of blue to red supergiants and the lifetimes in the WR stages.

Type
Part 2. Interiors of Massive Stars
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 212: A Massive Star Odyssey: From Main Sequence to Supernova , 2003 , pp. 267 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2003 

References

Chiosi, C., Maeder, A. 1986, Ann. Review Astron. Astrophys. 38, 143.Google Scholar
Heger, A., Langer, N. 2000, ApJ 544, 1016.Google Scholar
Heger, A., Langer, N., Woosley, S.E. 2000, ApJ 528, 368.Google Scholar
Herrero, A., Puls, J., Villamariz, M.R. 2000, A&A 354, 193.Google Scholar
Humphreys, R.M., McElroy, D.B. 1984, ApJ 284, 565.Google Scholar
Langer, N., Maeder, A. 1995, A&A 295, 685.Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1997, A&A 321, 134 (Paper II).Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1999, A&A 347, 185 (Paper IV).Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 2002, A&A 392, 575 (Paper IX).Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Conti, P. 1994, Ann. Review Astron. Astrophys. 32, 227.Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Desjacques, V. 2001, A&A (Letters) 372, L9.Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Grebel, E., Mermilliod, J.C. 1999, A&A 346, 459.Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Meynet, G. 2000a, Ann. Review Astron. Astrophys. 24, 329.Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Meynet, G. 2000b, A&A 361, 159 (Paper VII).Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Meynet, G. 2001, A&A 373, 555 (Paper VI).Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Zahn, J.P. 1998, A&A 334, 1000 (Paper III).Google Scholar
Martín, E.L., Basri, G. Gallegos, J.E. et al. 1998, ApJ (Letters) 499, L61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P., Johnson, O. 1998, ApJ 505, 793.Google Scholar
Meylan, G., Maeder, A. 1982, A&A 108, 148.Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Maeder, A. 1997, A&A 321, 465 (Paper I).Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Maeder, A. 2000, A&A 361, 101 (Paper V).Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Maeder, A. 2002, A&A 390, 561 (Paper VIII).Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Charbonnel, C. 1994, A&AS 103, 97.Google Scholar
Venn, K.A. 1998, in: Boulder-Munich II: Properties of Hot Luminous Stars, Howarth, I. (ed.), ASP-CS 131, 177.Google Scholar
Venn, K.A. 1999, ApJ 518, 405.Google Scholar
Vink, J.S., de Koter, A., Lamers, H. 2000, A&A 362, 295.Google Scholar