Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:26:26.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of the ultraviolet flux calibration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Jeffrey W. Kruk
Jeffrey W. Kruk*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MB, 21218, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The practical difficulties in performing laboratory calibrations of instruments at ultraviolet wavelengths are considerably greater than at visible wavelengths, and the concommitant uncertainties are greater as well. In recent years theoretical models of white dwarf atmospheres have been adopted as UV flux standards, with impressive results. In this review, I will discuss the methodology of laboratory flux calibrations in the UV, the internal consistency and potential shortcomings of calibrations based on white dwarf model atmospheres, recent laboratory results, and future prospects.

Type
Stellar Flux Distributions
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 189: Fundamental Stellar Properties: The Interaction Between Observation and Theory , 1997 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997 

References

Bergeron, P. 1993, in White Dwarfs: Advances in Observation and Theory, NATO ASI Series, ed. Barstow, M.A. (Kluwer: Dordrecht), p. 267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlin, R., Holm, A., Savage, B., Snijders, M., & Sparks, W. 1980, A&A 85, 1 Google Scholar
Bohlin, R.C., Colina, L., & Finley, D.S. 1995, AJ 110, 1316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canfield, L.R., & Swanson, N. 1987, J. Res. NBS 92, 97 Google Scholar
Davidsen, A.F., Long, K.S., Durrance, S.T., Blair, W.P., Bowers, C.W., Conard, S.J., Feldman, P.D., Ferguson, H.C., Fountain, G.H., Kimble, R.A., Kriss, G.A., Moos, H.W., Potocki, K.A., 1992, ApJ 392 264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, J., Vennes, S., Bowyer, S., Pradhan, A.K., & Thejll, P. 1995, ApJ 455, 574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, D.S., Koester, D., & Basri, G. 1997, ApJ, submitted Google Scholar
Hayes, D.S. 1985, in Calibration of Fundamental Stellar Quantities, Proc. IAU Symp. No. 111, eds. Hayes, D., Pasinetti, L., & Phillip, A. (Reidel, Dordrecht), p. 225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holberg, J.B., Forrester, W.T., Shemansky, D.E., & Barry, D.C. 1982, ApJ 257, 656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holberg, J.B., Ali, B., Carone, T.E., & Polidan, R.S. 1991, ApJ 375, 716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koester, D., Finley, D.S., Allard, N.F., Kruk, J.W., & Kimble, R.A. 1996, ApJ 463, L93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, J.W., Durrance, S.T., Kriss, G.A., Davidsen, A.F., Blair, W.P., Espey, B.R., & Finley, D.S. 1995, ApJ 454, L1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, J.W., Kimble, R.A., Buss, R.H., Davidsen, A.F., Durrance, S.T., Finley, D.S., Holberg, J.B., & Kriss, G.A. 1997, ApJ 482, in press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanz, T., Barstow, M.A., Hubeny, I., & Holberg, J.B. 1996, ApJ 473, 1089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megessier, C., these proceedings Google Scholar
Nichols, J.S., & Linsky, J.L. 1996, AJ 111, 517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoning, T., & Butler, K. 1989, A&AS 78, 51 Google Scholar
Vidal, C.R., Cooper, J., & Smith, E.W. 1970, ApJS 25, 37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar