Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:57:22.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation Between Rotation and Magnetic Activity on Lower Main Sequence Stars as Derived from Chromospheric Indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

R.W. Noyes
R.W. Noyes*
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is now firmly established that lower main sequence (LMS) stars show a qualitative correlation between rotation rate and chromospheric and coronal emission. By analogy with the Sun, the emission is believed to be intimately associated with surface magnetic fields. This association is especially close on the Sun for the Ca II H and K lines, for which the spatial correlation between chromospheric emission and photospheric fields is essentially one-to-one down to scales at least as fine as a few arcseconds and for which the emission flux from an area on the Sun is approximately proportional to the total magnetic flux passing through the same area in the underlying photosphere (Leighton 1959; Skumanich, Smythe, and Frazier 1975; Frazier 1971). The extension of the association to other LMS stars, while based on appeal to analogy, has been strengthened by recent detections of strong magnetic fields covering large fraction of the surface area of chromospherically active stars (see review by Marcy in this symposium).

Type
II. Rotation — Activity — Cycle — Age Connection: Observations
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 102: Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields: Origins and Coronal Effects , 1983 , pp. 133 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983 

References

Ayres, T. and Linsky, J.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 241, p. 279.Google Scholar
Baliunas, S.L., Vaughan, A.H., Hartmann, L.W., Middelkoop, F., Mihalas, D., Noyes, R.W., Preston, G.W., Frazer, J., and Lanning, H.: 1983, in preparation.Google Scholar
Belvedere, A., Paternò, L., and Stix, M.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 88, p. 240.Google Scholar
Catalano, S. and Marilli, E.: 1982, Astron. Astrophys., submitted.Google Scholar
Duncan, D.K.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, p. 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durney, B.R.: 1972, in “Solar Wind”, eds. Sonett, C., Coleman, P., Wilcox, J., NASA Sp-308, p. 282.Google Scholar
Durney, B.R. and Latour, J.: 1978, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 9, p. 241.Google Scholar
Durney, B.R., Mihalas, D., and Robinson, R.D.: 1981, Proc. Astron. Soc. Pacific 93, p. 537.Google Scholar
Durney, B.R. and Robinson, R.D.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 253, p. 290.Google Scholar
Durney, B.R. and Stenflo, J.O.: 1972, Astrophys. Space Sci. 15, p. 307.Google Scholar
Frazier, E.N.: 1971, Solar Phys. 21, p. 42.Google Scholar
Gilman, P.A.: 1980, in “Stellar Turbulence”, eds. Gray, D. and Linsky, J., Springer-Verlag, p. 19.Google Scholar
Hall, D.S.: 1981, in “Solar Phenomena in Stars and Stellar Systems”, eds. Bonnet, R. and Dupree, A.K., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 487.Google Scholar
Hartmann, L.W., Burnham, N., Soderblom, D., and Noyes, R.W.: 1983, in preparation.Google Scholar
Knobloch, E., Rosner, R., and Weiss, N.O.: 1981, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 197, p. 45P.Google Scholar
Kraft, R.P.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, p. 681.Google Scholar
Kraft, R.P.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, p. 551.Google Scholar
Leighton, R.B.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 130, p. 366.Google Scholar
Mewe, R., Schrijver, C.J., and Zwaan, C.: 1981, in “Proc. 15th ESLA Symposium”, ed. Andresen, R.D., Space Sci. Rev., 30, p. 191.Google Scholar
Middelkoop, F.: 1982, Astron. Astrophys. 107, p. 31.Google Scholar
Pallavicini, R., Golub, L., Rosner, R., Vaiana, G.S., Ayres, T., and Linsky, J.L.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, p. 279.Google Scholar
Rosner, R. and Vaiana, G.S.: 1980, in “X-Ray Astronomy”, eds. Giacconi, R. and Setti, G., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 129.Google Scholar
Schatzmann, E.: 1962, Ann. Astrophys. 25, p. 18.Google Scholar
Skumanich, A.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 171, p. 565.Google Scholar
Skumanich, A. and Eddy, J.: 1981, in “Solar Phenomena in Stars and Stellar Systems”, eds. Bonnet, R. and Dupree, A.K., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skumanich, A., Smythe, C., and Frazier, E.N.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 200, p. 747.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A.H.: 1980, Proc. Astron. Soc. Pacific 92, p. 392.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A.H., Baliunas, S.L., Middelkoop, F., Hartmann, L.W., Mihalas, D., Noyes, R.W., and Preston, G.W.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 250, p. 276.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A.H. and Preston, G.W.: 1980, Proc. Astron. Soc. Pacific 92, p. 385.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A.H., Preston, G.W., and Wilson, O.C.: 1978, Proc. Astron. Soc. Pacific 90, p. 267.Google Scholar
Vernazza, J.E., Avrett, E.H., and Loeser, R.: 1981, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 45, p. 635.Google Scholar
Walter, F.M.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 245, p. 677.Google Scholar
Walter, F.M.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 253, p. 745.Google Scholar
White, O.R. and Livingston, W.C.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 249, p. 798.Google Scholar
Wilson, O.C.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 226, 379.Google Scholar