Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:40:17.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radio Source Structure and Unified Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

J. B. Hutchings
Affiliation:
Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, 5071 W. Saanich Rd Victoria, B.C. V8X 4M6, Canada
S. G. Neff
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The results are presented of a program to study the radio structure of radio galaxies, and to compare them with quasars. The samples are matched in redshift and luminosity in the redshift range 0.2 to 1.0, and mapped with the same VLA configuration. The quasar results have been published in earlier papers and the radio galaxy results are in press. We compare 100 quasars with 80 radio galaxies. The comparison shows the following radio galaxies differ from quasars in the following ways:

  1. 1) The overall sizes are larger for radio galaxies by 2 to 3 times.

  2. 2) There are few large bend angles in radio galaxies.

  3. 3) The lobe length ratio distribution differs.

  4. 4) The radio galaxies have no population of one-sided sources.

  5. 5) The lobe flux ratio has less range in the radio galaxies.

  6. 6) Radio galaxies have few core-dominated sources and many with no detectable core: few with comparable core and lobe flux.

  7. 7) The most luminous sources are lobe-dominated and more powerful than the quasars. The most luminous quasars are unresolved cores.

Points 1,2,3 can be fit with a single ‘unified’ model which has a distribution of sizes and bend angles up to 25°, with small expansion velocities. The quasars are viewed within a cone angle of 50° and the radio galaxies outside the cone. However, the model does incorporate a source growth scenario and points 4 through 7 imply that there are instrinsic differences between the source types as well as orientation. We also discuss the limitations on beaming and bulk motions implied by the results.

Type
Poster Contributions: Radio Emission (Maps)
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994