Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-13T01:04:57.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quasar Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

M. G. Smith
M. G. Smith*
Affiliation:
United Kingdom Infrared Telescope, Hawaii Headquarters, 665 Komohana Street, Hilo, Hawaii, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A review is given of progress in surveys for quasars at frequencies from radio to x-ray. Radio results show evidence for a decline in the radio luminosity function for flat-spectrum radio sources at redshifts z > 2. The IRAS survey is uncovering hitherto unknown dusty Seyfert galaxies. Optical surveys, which yield the largest number of QSOs per square degree, may suffer from selection effects which depend on intrinsic luminosity, redshift, and spectral evolution - particularly above redshift 2. Below redshifts of about 2.3, the optical magnitude-redshift plane is being filled in to the point where the evolution of the luminosity function can be seen directly. The statistics of quasar pair separations provide the best evidence so far for quasar clustering.

The existence of many potentially significant selection effects means that a multi-frequency approach to quasar surveys is likely to prove essential to an understanding of the evolutionary behaviour of the quasar population as a whole.

Type
I. Surveys
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 119: Quasars , 1986 , pp. 17 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Anderson, S.F., 1985. , University of Washington: ‘The X-ray Properties of High-Redshift Optically-Selected QSOs’.Google Scholar
Atwood, B., Baldwin, J.A. & Carswell, R.F., 1985. Ap. J., 292, 58.Google Scholar
Avni, Y. & Tananbaum, H., 1982. Ap. J. (Letters), 262, L177 Google Scholar
Baldwin, J.A., Phillips, M.M. & Terlevich, R., 1981. P.A.S.P., 93, 5.Google Scholar
Beichman, C., Wynn-Williams, C.G., Lonsdale, C.J., Persson, S.E., Heasley, J.N., Miley, G.K., Soifer, B.T., Neugebauer, G., Becklin, E.E. & Houck, J.R., 1985. Ap. J., 293, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezler, M., Kendziorra, E., Staubert, R., Hasinger, G., Pietsch, W., Reppin, C., Trümper, J., & Voges, W., 1984. Astron. and Ap., 136, 351.Google Scholar
Boyle, B.J., Fong, R., Shanks, T. & Clowes, R.G., 1985. M.N.R.A.S., 216, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branduardi-Raymont, G., Mason, K.O., Murdin, P.G. & Martin, C., 1985. M.N.R.A.S., 216, 1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clowes, R.G., 1985. M.N.R.A.S., in press. ‘Automated quasar detection in the SGP field: a clustering study’.Google Scholar
Clowes, R.G., Cooke, J.A. & Beard, S.M., 1984. M.N.R.A.S., 207, 99.Google Scholar
Clowes, R.G. & Savage, A., 1983. M.N.R.A.S., 204, 365.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J.S., Downes, A.J.B., Peacock, J.A., Savage, A., Lilly, S.J., Watson, F.G. & Longair, M.S., 1985. Nature, in press. ‘Discovery of a Quasar with z = 3.71 and Limits on the Number of More Distant Objects.’ Google Scholar
Elvis, M. & Lawrence, A., 1985. In ‘Astrophysics of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei’, Proc. 7th Santa Cruz Workshop on Astronomy and Astrophysics, (ed. Miller, J.S.), p289.Google Scholar
Elvis, M. & van Speybroeck, L.P., 1982. Ap. J. (Letters), 257, L51.Google Scholar
Elvis, M., Wilkes, B.J. & Tananbaum, H., 1985. Ap. J., 292, 357.Google Scholar
Gatley, I., Jones, T.J., Hyland, A.R., Beattie, D.H. & Lee, T.J., 1984. M.N.R.A.S., 210, 565.Google Scholar
Geballe, T.R., Krisciunas, K., Lee, T.J., Gatley, I., Wade, R., Duncan, W.D., Garden, R. & Becklin, E.E., 1984. Ap. J., 284, 118.Google Scholar
Grindlay, J.E., Steiner, J.E., Forman, W.R., Canizares, C.R. & McClintock, J.E., 1980. Ap. J., 239, L43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, J.P. & Steiner, J.E. 1983. Ap. J. (Letters), 269, L37.Google Scholar
Hawkins, M.R.S., 1985. M.N.R.A.S., 216, 589.Google Scholar
Hazard, C., 1984. M.N.R.A.S., 211, 45P.Google Scholar
Hazard, C., 1985. In Proc. Manchester Conf. ‘Active Galactic Nuclei’, pl. (Ed. Dyson, J.E.) University of Manchester press.Google Scholar
Hazard, C. & McMahon, R., 1985. Nature, 314, 238.Google Scholar
Hazard, C., Morton, D., Terlevich, R. & McMahon, R., 1984. Ap. J., 282, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, X.-T., Cannon, R.D., Peacock, J.A., Smith, M.G. & Oke, J.B., 1984. M.N.R.A.S., 211, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, T.M., 1980a. Astron. and Ap., 87, 142.Google Scholar
Heckman, T.M., 1980b. Astron. and Ap., 87, 152.Google Scholar
Heckman, T.M., 1980c. Astron. and Ap., 88, 365.Google Scholar
Hewett, P.C., 1984. In Proc. Astronomical Measuring Machines Workshop ‘Astronomy from Measuring Machines’, p5. (Royal Greenwich Observatory).Google Scholar
Hewett, P.C. & Irwin, M.J., 1986. Preprint, ‘Finding high-redshift quasars using low-resolution spectra’.Google Scholar
Hewett, P.C., Irwin, M.J., Bunclark, P., Bridgeland, M.T., Kibblewhite, E.J., He, X.-T. & Smith, M.G., 1985. M.N.R.A.S., 213, 971.Google Scholar
Keel, W.C., 1983. Ap. J., Suppl., 52, 229.Google Scholar
Keel, W.C., 1983. Ap. J. 269, 466.Google Scholar
Keel, W.C., 1985. In ‘Astrophysics of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei’, Proc. 7th Santa Cruz Workshop on Astronomy and Astrophysics, (ed. Miller, J. S.), p1.Google Scholar
Kembhavi, A.K. & Fabian, A.C., 1982. M.N.R.A.S., 198, 921.Google Scholar
Koo, D., 1983. In Proc. 24th Liège Astrophysical Symposium ‘Quasars and Gravitational Lenses’, p240. (Institut d'Astrophysique, Leige).Google Scholar
Koo, D., 1985. In Proc. Trieste Conf. ‘The Structure and Evolution of AGNs’, in press.Google Scholar
Koo, D. & Kron, R., 1980. P.A.S.P., 92, 537.Google Scholar
Kriss, G.A. & Canizares, C.R., 1985. Ap. J., 297, 177.Google Scholar
Lewis, D.W., MacAlpine, G.M., & Weedman, D.W., 1979. Ap. J., 233, 787.Google Scholar
Malkan, M.A., 1983. Ap. J., 268, 582.Google Scholar
Malkan, M.A. & Sargent, W.L.W., 1982. Ap. J., 254, 22.Google Scholar
Margon, B., Chanan, G.A. & Downes, R.A., 1982. Ap. J. (Letters), 253, L7.Google Scholar
Marshall, H., 1984. Ap. J., 283, 50.Google Scholar
Marshall, H., 1985. Ap. J., 299, 109.Google Scholar
Miley, and de Grijp, R., 1985. In Proc. 1st IRAS Symposium, Noordwijk. ‘IRAS Observations of Active Galaxies - a Review’ (Space Telescope Science Institute Preprint #65).Google Scholar
Mushotsky, R.F., 1982. Ap. J., 256, 92.Google Scholar
Mushotsky, R.F. & Marshall, F.E., 1980. Ap. J., 239, L5.Google Scholar
Mushotsky, R.F., Marshall, F.E., Boldt, E.A., Holt, S.S., & Seriemitsos, P.J., 1980. Ap. J., 235, 377.Google Scholar
Osmer, P.S., 1982. Ap. J., 253, 28.Google Scholar
Peacock, J., 1985. Edinburgh Astronomy Preprint #12/85: ‘The High-Redshift Evolution of Radio Galaxies and Quasars’.Google Scholar
Peacock, J.A. & Gull, S.F., 1981. M.N.R.A.S., 196, 611.Google Scholar
Peacock, J., Miller, L. & Longair, M.S., 1985. Edinburgh Astronomy Preprint #17/85. ‘The Statistics of Radio Emission from Quasars’.Google Scholar
Penston, M.V. & Perez, E., 1984. M.N.R.A.S., 211, 33P.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.A., Savage, A., Jauncey, D.L., & Wright, A.E., 1982. Ap. J. (Letters), 260, L27.Google Scholar
Petre, R., Mushotsky, R.F., Krolik, J.H., & Holt, S.S., 1984. Ap. J., 280, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M.M., Charles, P.A. & Baldwin, J.A., 1983. Ap. J., 266, 485.Google Scholar
Piccinotti, G., Mushotsky, R.F., Boldt, E.A., Holt, S.S., Marshall, F.E., Seriemitsos, P.J., & Shafer, R.A., 1982. Ap. J., 253, 485.Google Scholar
Reichert, G.A., Mushotsky, R.F., Petre, R. & Holt, S.S., 1985. Ap. J., 296, 69.Google Scholar
Rothschild, R.E., Mushotsky, R.F., Baity, W.A., Gruber, D.E., Matteson, J.L. & Peterson, L.E., 1983. Ap. J., 269, 423.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. & Green, R.F., 1983. Ap. J., 269, 352.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Schneider, , & Gunn, J.E., 1985. Preprint. Google Scholar
Schneider, D., Schmidt, M. & Gunn, J.E., 1984. B.A.A.S., 16, 488.Google Scholar
Setti, G. & Woltjer, L., 1979. Astron. and Ap., 76, L1.Google Scholar
Serabyn, E. & Lacy, J.H., 1985. Ap. J., 293, 445.Google Scholar
Shanks, T., Fong, R. & Boyle, B.J., 1983. Nature, 303, 156.Google Scholar
Shaver, P.A., & Robertson, J.G., 1983. Nature, 303, 155.Google Scholar
Smith, M.G., 1975. Ap. J., 202, 591.Google Scholar
Smith, M.G., 1978. Vistas in Astron., 22, 321.Google Scholar
Smith, M.G., 1983. In Proc. 24th Liège Astrophysical Symposium ‘Quasars and Gravitational Lenses’, p4. (Institut d'Astrophysique, Leige).Google Scholar
Smith, M.G., 1984. In Proc. Astronomical Measuring Machines Workshop ‘Astronomy from Measuring Machines’, p100. (Royal Greenwich Observatory).Google Scholar
Smith, M.G., 1985. Proc. Manchester Conf. ‘Active Galactic Nuclei’, p103. (Ed. Dyson, J. E. - University of Manchester press.)Google Scholar
Stauffer, J.R., 1982. Ap. J., Suppl., 50, 517.Google Scholar
Stobie, R.S., 1984. In Proc. Astronomical Measuring Machines Workshop ‘Astronomy from Measuring Machines’, p5. (Royal Greenwich Observatory.)Google Scholar
Tananbaum, H., Avni, Y., Branduardi, G., Elvis, M., Fabbiano, G., Feigelson, E., Giacconi, R., Henry, J.P., Pye, J.P., Soltan, A. & Zamorani, G., 1979. Ap. J. (Letters), 234, L9.Google Scholar
Veron-Cetty, M.P. & Veron, P., 1984. ‘A Catalogue of Quasars and Active Nuclei (2nd Edition)’, Munich: ESO Sci. Rep. 4.Google Scholar
Wampler, E.J. & Ponz, D., 1985. Ap. J., 298, 448.Google Scholar
Webster, R.L., Hewett, P.C., & Irwin, M.J., 1986. Preprint. ‘An Automated Survey for Gravitational Lenses’.Google Scholar
Weymann, R.J., Turnshek, D.A., & Christiansen, W.A., 1986. Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar