Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:45:33.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population II in the Milky Way Galaxy and The LMC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

Nicholas B. Suntzeff
Nicholas B. Suntzeff*
Affiliation:
Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Casilla 603, La Serena, CHILE

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The RR Lyrae and globular cluster populations are used to study the Pop II in the Galaxy and the LMC. The metallicity gradient in the Galaxy changes abruptly at the position of the solar circle. The statistics of field RR Lyraes imply that the Pop II field population is older towards the Galactic center. The density of RR Lyraes in the solar neighborhood implies a luminous mass density of 6.4 ± 1.8 × 10–5M⊙ pc–3 for the Galactic halo. The total luminosities (MV) for the Galactic and LMC halos are −18.4 and −15.1, and the ratio of globular cluster to luminous Pop II mass is 0.02 in both cases. The agreement of this ratio in two systems with very different tidal fields argues against the formation of the field population as the disruption of many smaller systems.

Type
I. The Stellar Populations in the Milky Way
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 149: The Stellar populations of Galaxies , 1992 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 

References

Bothun, G.D., and Thompson, I.B.: 1988, AJ 96, 877.Google Scholar
Carney, B.W., and Latham, D.W.: 1987, AJ 93, 116.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J. Lynden-Bell, D., and Sandage, A.R.: 1962, ApJ. 136, 749.Google Scholar
Friel, E.D.: 1988, AJ 95, 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G., and Wyse, R.F.G.: 1985, AJ 90, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinman, T.D.: 1965, Ap.J. Suppl 11, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, G.E., Suntzeff, N.B., and Kraft, R.P.: 1991, PASP , submitted.Google Scholar
Morrsion, H.L., Flynn, C., and Freeman, K.C.: 1990, AJ 100, 1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olszewski, E.W., Schommer, R.A., Suntzeff, N.B., and Harris, H.C.: 1991, AJ 101, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltoglou, G.: 1990, BAAS 22, 1289.Google Scholar
Preston, G.W., Shectman, S.A., and Beers, T.C.: 1991, Ap.J. 375, 121.Google Scholar
Ratnatunga, K.U., and Freeman, K.C.: 1989, Ap.J. 339, 126.Google Scholar
Saha, A.: 1984, Ap.J. 283, 580.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1975, Ap.J. 202, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schommer, R.A., Olszewski, E.W., Suntzeff, N.B., and Harris, H.C.: 1991, AJ , accepted.Google Scholar
Strom, S.E., et al.: 1981, Ap.J. 245, 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suntzeff, N.B., Kinman, T.D., and Kraft, R.P.: 1991, Ap.J. 367, 528 SKK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suntzeff, N.B., et al.: 1991, AJ , submitted.Google Scholar