Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:16:53.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Goodness of Different Mass Estimators from N-body Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

J Perea ,
A. del Olmo  and
M. Moles
J Perea
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Apdo. 2144, 18080 Granada, Spain
A. del Olmo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Apdo. 2144, 18080 Granada, Spain
M. Moles
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Apdo. 2144, 18080 Granada, Spain

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

N-body models were run in order to test the mass estimators considered by Heisler, Tremaine and Bahcall (1985, HTB), when systems with a large number of mass-points with a non-flat mass-spectrum are considered. The initial conditions of the models were a analytic King profile for the number density, a Gaussian velocity distribution function and a Schechter-type mass spectrum. The models were left to evolve from a far from virial initial configuration, so a violent collapse occurs before the system reachs equilibrium. The code we use was NBODY2 code kindly provided to us by Dr. S. Aarseth.

Type
Appendix 1: Poster Papers
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 130: Large Scale Structures of the Universe , 1988 , pp. 558
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Heisler, J., Tremaine, S. and Bahcall, J.: 1985, Ap. J. 298, p. 8.Google Scholar
Kent, S.M., Gunn, J.E.: 1982, Astron. J., 87, p. 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar