Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:02:47.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Accretion Disk Models by Stationary and Non-Stationary Shock Waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Sandip K. Chakrabarti*
Affiliation:
TIFR, Bombay (Permanent address) & ICTP, Trieste

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An important point which emerged from this meeting is that disks in AGNs are not simply thin, Keplerian type; they show more complex behaviour. Chakrabarti (1990a and references therein) has shown that in an inviscid accretion disk with significant angular momentum, the centrifugal barrier is strong enough to produce axisymmetric standing shock wave. Subsequently, this work was extended to include the non-axisymmetric and viscous disks (Chakrabarti, 1990b). Particularly important are the solutions with viscosity, as they show that as the viscosity is increased, the stable becomes weaker and weaker till it disappears completely. This solution has a unifying character that inviscid pressure driven disks have almost constant angular momentum and can have shock discontinuities, but viscous driven disks dissipate angular momentum quick enough not to have centrifugal barrier and therefore no shock waves. Chakrabarti & Molteni (1993), using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics have shown that shocks are produced in inviscid disks, exactly where they are predicted.

Unlike a Keplerian disk, a disk with a shock has basically two temperature zones. The post shock solution is responsible for the Big Blue Bump and UV excess (Chakrabarti and Wiita, 1992). At the shock location, the disk is ‘bulged’ the hard radiation from this region is intercepted by the cooler pre-shock flow. The shock strength and location are sensitive to input specific energy of the flow. This configuration might be responsible for the ‘zero-lag’ correlated variability of, say, NGC 5548 (Chakrabarti, Haardt, Maraschi & Molendi, AA, submitted) discussed in this meeting. Spiral shocks which may be produced in disks in a binary system can also appear in disks around AGNs; the perturbation may be due to passage of massive objects (Chakrabarti & Wiita, 1993a). They also cause time variations in the double horned pattern from disk line emission (Chakrabarti & Wiita 1993b) as observed in, say ARP 102B. All these observations point that shocks are probably important ingredients in any accretion disk in AGNs

Type
Poster Contributions: Disks Structure and Emission
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Chakrabarti, S. K., 1990a, ApJ , 362, 406.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. K. 1990b, MNRAS , 243, 610.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. K. D., Molteni 1993, ApJ , (Nov. 10th).Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. K. P.J., Wiita, 1992, ApJ , 387, L21.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. K. P. J., Wiita, 1993a, ApJ , 411, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. K. P. J., Wiita, 1993b, AA , 271, 216.Google Scholar