Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T20:00:52.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations Requiring a Non-Standard Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Halton Arp*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, D-8046 Garching bei München

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Extragalactic astronomy rests on the assumption that red-shifts are always equal to velocities and that large velocities are unambiguous distance indicators. There are now many observations which disprove this fundamental assumption. We here review the evidence which has been accumulating for 20 years with particular emphasis on the most recent developments.

Type
Chapter VII: The Non-Standard Approach
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

1. Arp, H. 1986 “Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies” published by Interstellar Media, 2153 Russell Street Berkeley 94705.Google Scholar
2. Burbidge, G. 1968, Ap. J. 154, L41.Google Scholar
3. Karlsson, K.G. 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 58, 237.Google Scholar
4. Depaquit, S., Pecker, J.-C., and Vigier, J.-P. 1984, Astronomische Nachrichten 305, 339.Google Scholar
5. Box, T.C. and Roeder, R.C. 1984, Astron. Astrophys. 134, 234.Google Scholar
6. Arp, H. 1986, J. Astrophys. Astron. (India) 7, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Burbidge, G.R., O'Dell, S.L. and Strittmatter, P.A. 1972, Ap. J. 175, 601.Google Scholar
8. Arp, H. 1983, Ap. J. 271, 479.Google Scholar
9. Arp, H. 1980, Ann. N.Y. Academy of Sciences 336, 94.Google Scholar
10. Arp, H. 1981, Ap. J. 250, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arp, H. 1983, Ap. J. 271, 479 Google Scholar
11. Zuiderwijk, E.J. and de Ruiter, H.R. 1983, N.N.R.A.S. 204, 675.Google Scholar
12. Cecil, G. and Stockton, A. 1985, Ap. J. 288, 201.Google Scholar
13. Sulentic, J.W. and Arp, H. 1986, “the Galaxy-Quasar Connection NGC 4319/Mark 205”. Ap. J. submitted.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kunth, D. and Bergeron, J. 1984, M.N.R.A.S. 210, 873.Google Scholar
15. Kronberg, P., Burbidge, E.M., Smith, H.E. and Strom, R.G. 1977, Ap. J. 218, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Bridle, A.H. and Perley, R.A., 1984, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. Vol. 22.Google Scholar
17. Arp, H., Wolstencroft, R.D. and He, X.T. 1984, Ap. J. 285, 44.Google Scholar
18. Arp, H. and Duhalde, O. 1985, P.A.S.P. 94, 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Burbidge, E.M. Junkkarinen, V.T., Koski, A.T., Smith, H.E., and Hoag, A.A., 1980, Ap. J. 242, L55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Condon, J.J. 1983, Ap. J. Supp. 53, 459.Google Scholar
21. Kronberg, P., Biermann, P. and Schwab, F.R. 1985, Ap. J. 291, 693.Google Scholar
22. Arp, H. 1986, Nature 322, 316.Google Scholar
23. Arp, H. 1986, “3C 120 and the Surrounding Region of Sky” J. Astrophys. Astr. (India) submitted.Google Scholar
24. Arp, H. 1982, Ap. J. 263, 70.Google Scholar
25. Arp, H. and Sulentic, J.W. 1985, Ap. J. 291, 88.Google Scholar
26. Arp, H. 1986 “The Hubble Relation: Differences Between Galaxy Typs Sb and Sc. Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik No.236; A.J. submitted.Google Scholar
27. Arp, H. 1986, “Quantization and Systematic Redshifts in the Two Nearest Groups of Galaxies”. J. Astrophys. Astr. (India) submitted.Google Scholar
28. Arp, H. 1986, Astron. Astrophys. 156, 207.Google Scholar
29. de Vaucouleurs, G. 1972, IAU Symposium No.44, 353.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G. and Peters, W.L. 1986, Ap. J. 303, 19 Google Scholar
30. Giraud, E. 1986, Ap. J. 301, 7.Google Scholar