Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T15:30:00.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nearby Small Groups of Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. Brent Tully  and
J. Richard Fisher
R. Brent Tully
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii
J. Richard Fisher
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To date, our view of the universe has largely been two-dimensional. Velocity data, the basis for a look in the third dimension, have been too incomplete and uneven in quality to provide a clear picture. Nonetheless, the pioneering work by de Vaucouleurs (1975) has given us a rough idea of what the universe is like locally. At least a good fraction of galaxies are improbably close to their nearest neighbours compared with expectations based on statistical fluctuations of a random distribution. Our vocabulary to describe these associations includes the words: binary, group, cloud, cluster and supercluster. Does the real universe indeed have characteristic scales that make these terms meaningful? Or, as Peebles and his co-workers (Davis, Groth & Peebles 1977, and reference therein) would have us believe, is there structure on all scales, at least up to about 15 Mpc? and associated galaxies aside, are there galaxies truly randomly distributed: are there field galaxies? Looking two-dimensionally, it has been possible to arrive at remarkably different conclusions. Turner & Gott (1975) concluded that roughly 40% of all galaxies are randomly distributed while Soneira & Peebles (1977) set an upper limit of 18%. It was roughly this latter figure that de Vaucouleurs (1975) derived with his early look into the third dimension. So we ask: (1) what are the characteristic scales and densities of galaxy associations, and (2) what are the scales and densities of the voids?

Type
I. Galaxies in Small Groups
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 79: The Large Scale Structure of the Universe , 1978 , pp. 31 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1978 

References

Davis, M., Groth, E.J. & Peebles, P.J.E.: 1977, Ap.J. (Letters) 212, L107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J.R. & Tully, R.B.: 1975, Astron. & Astrophys. 44, 151.Google Scholar
Gott, J.R. & Turner, E.L.: 1977, Ap. J. 213, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J.C.: 1975, MNRAS 173, 41P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karachentsev, I.D.: 1970, Problems of Cosmic Physics 5, 201. (Kiev State University).Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I.D.: 1976, IAU Colloq. #37, 321. (Ed. Balkowski, & Westerlund, , CNRS, Paris).Google Scholar
Materne, J.: 1974, Astron. & Astrophys. 33, 451.Google Scholar
Materne, J. & Tammann, G.A.: 1974, Astron. & Astrophys. 37, 383.Google Scholar
Nilson, P.: 1973, Uppsala General Catalogue of Galaxies, Uppsala Astron. Obs. Ann., Band 6.Google Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E.: 1973, Ap. J. 185, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rood, H.J., Rothman, V.C.A. & Turnrose, B.E.: 1970, Ap. J. 162, 411.Google Scholar
Sandage, A.R. & Tammann, G.A.: 1975, Ap. J. 196, 313.Google Scholar
Soneira, R.M. & Peebles, P.J.E.: 1977, Ap. J. 211, 1.Google Scholar
Tully, R.B. & Fisher, J.R.: 1976, IAU Colloq. #37, 95. (Ed. Balkowski, & Westerlund, , CNRS, Paris).Google Scholar
Turner, E.L.: 1976, Ap. J. 208, 304.Google Scholar
Turner, E.L. & Gott, J.R.: 1975, Ap. J. (Letters) 197, L89.Google Scholar
Turner, E.L. & Gott, J.R.: 1976, Ap. J. Suppl. 32, 409.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G.: 1975, Stars & Stellar Systems IX, Ch. 14.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G.: 1976, Ap. J. 203, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A. & Corwin, H.G.: 1976, Second Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies, U. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, F.: 1933, Helvetica Phys. Acta. 6, 110.Google Scholar