Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:03:08.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Distributions in Galactic Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Hélène R. Dickel
Hélène R. Dickel*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Observatory, Ill., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The 4830 MHz absorption line of formaldehyde has been observed in the SNR complex W44 and the H ii region complex W3. The results are presented as maps of apparent optical depth. The formaldehyde is concentrated toward the eastern edge of the shell and reaches a maximum apparent optical depth of 1.5 compared with 0.2 for OH; furthermore the centers of the H2CO and OH concentrations are displaced by about 6′. The velocities of the H2CO and OH agree and both molecular lines have the same velocity gradient across the source.

The H2CO absorption profiles for W3 (IC 1795) exhibit at least two narrow components whose average velocity becomes more negative toward the NE. The greatest optical depth occurs where the optical obscurration is high but not at the position of maximum Av. A general agreement between the velocities of other molecules and the H2CO values is indicated.

Type
Part V Distribution of Dust and Gas
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 52: Interstellar Dust and Related Topics , 1973 , pp. 277 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1973 

References

Buhl, D. and Snyder, L.: 1972, private communication. Google Scholar
Chaisson, E. J.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 18, 149.Google Scholar
Dickel, H. R. and Wall, J. V.: 1971, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 3, 459.Google Scholar
Dickel, H. R. and Wall, J. V.: 1972, ‘Carina Nebula II: 18 cm OH Observations and Comparison of the Distribution of OH and H2CO Molecules’, in preparation.Google Scholar
Goss, W. M., Caswell, J. L., and Robinson, B. J.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 14, 481.Google Scholar
Ishida, K. and Kawajiri, N.: 1968, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 20, 95.Google Scholar
Knowles, S. H., Mayer, C. H., Cheung, A. C., Rank, D. M., and Townes, C. H.: 1969, Science 163, 1055.Google Scholar
Milne, D. K.: 1969, Australian J. Phys. 22, 613.Google Scholar
Penzias, A. A., Jefferts, K. B., and Wilson, R. W.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 165, 229.Google Scholar
Rubin, R. H. and Mezger, P. G.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 407.Google Scholar
Turner, B. E.: 1970, Astrophys. Letters 6, 99.Google Scholar
Whiteoak, J. B. and Gardner, F. F.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 21, 159.Google Scholar
Wynn-Williams, C. G., Becklin, E. E., and Neugebauer, G.: 1973, this volume, p. 459.Google Scholar