Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:55:48.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Millisecond Pulsar Formation and Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

E.P.J. van den Heuvel
E.P.J. van den Heuvel*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The evolutionary history of binary radio pulsars, including the two millisecond binary pulsars, is reviewed. There are two groups of binary pulsars, the PSR 1913+16-group, which descended from massive X-ray binaries, and the PSR 1953+29-group, which descended from fairly wide low-mass X-ray binaries. The neutron stars in the second group probably formed by the accretion-induced collapse of a massive white dwarf. The companion stars in both groups of systems are expected to be dead stars, i.e. white dwarfs or neutron stars.

The large total number of millisecond binary pulsars in the galaxy (∼ 104), indicates that magnetic fields of neutron stars do not decay below a value of order 109 G. Possible explanations for this phenomenon are discussed.

Coalescence with a close degenerate companion provides a viable model for the formation of the single millisecond pulsar.

Type
IV. Neutron Stellar Evolution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 125: The Origin and Evolution of Neutron Stars , 1987 , pp. 393 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Alpar, M.A., Cheng, A.F., Ruderman, M.A. and Shaham, J., 1982, Nature 300, 728.Google Scholar
Alpar, M.A. and Shaham, J., 1985a, IAU Circ. No.4046.Google Scholar
Alpar, M.A. and Shaham, J., 1985b, Nature 316, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arons, J., 1981, IAU Symp. No.95, 69.Google Scholar
Blaauw, A., 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands 15, 265.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, D. and Srinivasan, G., 1986, Current Science 55, 327.Google Scholar
Bisnovaty-Kogan, G.S. and Komberg, B.V., 1974, Astron. Zh. 51, 373 (Soviet Astron. 18, 217).Google Scholar
Blondin, J.M. and Freese, K., 1986, Nature (in the press).Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, P. and Taam, R.E., 1984, Astrophys. J. 280, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsema, P.F.J. and van den Heuvel, E.P.J., 1985, Astr. Astrophys. 146, L3.Google Scholar
Fabian, A.C., Pringle, J.E., Verbunt, F., Wade, R., 1983, Nature 301, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowers, E. and Ruderman, M.A., 1977, Astrophys. J. 215, 302.Google Scholar
Habets, G.M.H.J., 1985, , University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Habets, G.M.H.J., 1986, Astr. Astrophys. (in the press).Google Scholar
Helfland, D.J., Ruderman, M.A. and Shaham, J., 1983, Nature 304, 423.Google Scholar
Henrichs, H.F., 1983, in: Accretion-Driven Stellar X-ray Sources, Lewin, W.H.G. and van den Heuvel, E.P.J. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, 393.Google Scholar
Henrichs, H.F. and van den Heuvel, E.P.J., 1983, Nature 303, 213.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, L.C., 1985, Nature 319, 384.Google Scholar
Joss, P.C. and Rappaport, S.A., 1983, Nature 304, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, S.R., 1986a, IAU Circ. No.4160.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, S.R., 1986b, Astrophys. J. (in the press).Google Scholar
Kundt, W., 1981, Astr. Astrophys 98, 207.Google Scholar
McClintock, J.E. and Rappaport, S.A. Proc. Seventh North American Workshop on Cataclysmic Binaries and Low-Mass X-ray Binaries Center for Astrophys.). In the press.Google Scholar
Meyer, F. and Meyer-Hofmeister, E., 1979, Astr. Astrophys. 78, 167.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B., 1971, Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 9, 183.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, V., 1982, Contemp. Phys. 23, 207.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, V., 1986, in: Highlights of Astronomy 7, Reidel. Pub. Comp. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, V. and Srinivasan, G., 1982, Curr. Science 51, 1096.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S.A. and Joss, P.C., 1983, in: Accretion-Driven Stellar X-ray Sources, Eds. Lewin, W.H.G. and van den Heuvel, E.P.J., Cambridge Univ. Press, 1.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S.A., Verbunt, F. and Joss, P.C., 1983, Astrophys. J. 275, 713.Google Scholar
Ruderman, M.A. and Shaham, J., 1983, Nature 304, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruderman, M.A. and Shaham, J., 1985, Astrophys. J. 289, 244.Google Scholar
Ruderman, M.A. and Sutherland, P.G., 1976, Astrophys. J. 196, 51.Google Scholar
Smarr, L.L. and Blandford, R.D., 1976, Astrophys. J. 207, 574.Google Scholar
Stokes, G.H., Segelstein, D.J., Taylor, J.H. and Dewey, R.J., 1986, Astrophys. J. (in the press).Google Scholar
Taam, R.E., 1983, Astrophys. J. 270, 694.Google Scholar
Taam, R.E., Bodenheimer, P., Ostriker, J.P., 1978 Astrophys. J. 222, 269.Google Scholar
Taam, R.E., and van den Heuvel, E.P.J., 1986, Astrophys. J. 305, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taam, R.E. and Wade, R.A., 1985, Astrophys. J. 293, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J., 1984, J. Astrophys. Astr. 5, 209.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J., 1986a, in: The Evolution of Galactic X-ray Binaries, eds. Truemper, J. et al., Reidel Pub. Comp. Dordrecht, 107.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J., 1986b, in: High-Energy Phenomena Around Collapsed Stars, Ed. Pacini, F., Reidel Pub. Comp, Dordrecht (in the press).Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. and Bonsema, P.F.J., 1984, Astr. Astrophys. 139, L16.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. and Habets, G.M.H.J., 1985, in: Supernovae, Their Progenitors and Remnants, Eds. Srinivasan, G. and Radhakrishnan, V., Indian Acad. Sc., Bangalore, 129.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. and Taam, R.E., 1984, Nature 309, 235.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J., van Paradijs, J.A. and Taam, R.E., 1986, Nature (in the press).Google Scholar
Webbink, R.F., Rappaport, S.A. and Savonije, G.J., 1983, Astrophys. J. 270, 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, J.M. and Taylor, J.H., 1984, Phys. Rev. Letters 52, 1348.Google Scholar