Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:37:57.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large Scale Solar Magnetic Fields and Their Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Gordon Newkirk Jr.
Gordon Newkirk Jr.*
Affiliation:
High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research*, Boulder, Colo., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The general properties of large scale solar magnetic fields are reviewed. In order of size these are: (1) Active region, generally bipolar fields with a lifetime of about two solar rotations. These are characterized by fields of several hundred G and display differential rotation similar to that found for the photosphere. (2) UM regions which appear to be the remnants of active region fields dispersed by the action of supergranulation convection and distorted by differential rotation. These are characterized by fields of a few tens of gauss and have lifetimes of several solar rotations. (3) The polar fields which are built up over the solar cycle by the preferential migration of a given polarity towards the poles. The poloidal fields are of a few gauss in magnitude and reverse sign in about 22 yr. (4) The large scale sector fields. These appear closely related to the interplanetary sector structure, cover tens of degrees in longitude, and stretch across the equator with the same polarity. This pattern endures for periods of up to a year or more, is not distorted by differential rotation, and has a rotation period of about 27 days. The presence of these long enduring sector fields may be related to the phenomenon of active solar longitudes. The consequences of large scale fields are examined with particular emphasis on the effects displayed by the corona. Calculated magnetic field patterns in the corona are compared with the density structure of the corona with the conclusion that: (1) Small scale structures in the corona, such as rays, arches, and loops, reflect the shape of the field and appear as magnetic tubes of force preferentially filled with more coronal plasma than the background. (2) Coronal density enhancements appear over plages where the field strength and presumably the mechanical energy transport into the corona are higher than normal. (3) Coronal streamers form above the ‘neutral line’ between extended UM regions of opposite polarity. The role played by coronal magnetic fields in transient events is also discussed. Some examples are: (1) The location of Proton Flares in open, diverging configurations of the field. (2) The expulsion of ‘magnetic bottles’ into the interplanetary medium by solar flares. (3) The relation of Type IV radio bursts to the ambient field configuration. (4) The guiding of Type II burst exciters by the ambient magnetic field. (5) The magnetic connection between widely separated active regions which display correlated radio bursts.

Type
Part VI: Optical and Radio Observations of Large Scale Magnetic Fields on the Sun
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 43: Solar Magnetic Fields , 1971 , pp. 547 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

Altschuler, M. D. and Newkirk, G. Jr.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altschuler, M. D., Newkirk, G. Jr., Trotter, D. E., and Howard, R.: 1971, this volume, p. 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, H. D.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 130, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, H. W.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, H. W. and Babcock, H. D.: 1953, in The Sun , (ed. by Kuiper, G. P.) p. 704.Google Scholar
Babcock, H. W. and Babcock, H. D.: 1955, Astrophys. J. 121, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, F. H.: 1889, The Solar Corona , Smithsonian Institute, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Bohlin, J. D.: 1968, , Department of Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Bohlin, J. D. and Simon, M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boischot, A. and Clavelier, B.: 1967, Astrophys. Letters 1, 7.Google Scholar
Brandt, J. C.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 147, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, J. C., Wolff, C., and Cassinelli, Joseph: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumba, V. and Howard, R.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumba, V. and Howard, R.: 1969, Solar Phys. 7, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, T. G.: 1953, in The Sun , (ed. by Kuiper, G. P.) p. 565.Google Scholar
Dennison, P. A.: 1970, Private Communication.Google Scholar
Dodson-Prince, H. W. and Hedeman, E. R.: 1968, in Kiepenheuer, K. O. (ed.), ‘Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions’, IAU Symp. 35, 56.Google Scholar
Dulk, G. A.: 1970, submitted to Australian J. Phys. Google Scholar
Fan, C. Y., Pick, M., Pyle, R., Simpson, J. A., and Smith, D. R.: 1968, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, G. E.: 1908, Astrophys. J. 28, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, G. E.: 1913, Astrophys. J. 38, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, R. T., Hansen, S. F., and Loomis, H. G.: 1970, Solar Phys. 10, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, J. W.: 1969, , Department of Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Howard, R.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 130, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R.: 1967, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R., Bumba, V., and Smith, S. F.: 1967, Atlas of Solar Magnetic Fields , Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication 626.Google Scholar
Howard, R. and Harvey, J. W.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1968, Space Sci. Rev. 8, 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanchuk, V. I.: 1968, Problems in Cosmic Physics , p. 129.Google Scholar
Kai, K.: 1969a, Proc. Astron. Soc. Australian 1, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kai, K.: 1969b, Solar Phys. 10, 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiepenheuer, K. O.: 1953, Proc. 9, Volta Conference, Rome, 1.Google Scholar
Krieger, A. S., Vaiana, G. S., and Van Speybroeck, L. P.: 1971, this volume, p. 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperus, M. and Tandberg-Hanssen, E.: 1967, Solar Phys. 2, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, R. B.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, R. B.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, G. S., Sata, T., Seidel, B. L., Stelzried, C. T., Ohlson, J. E., and Rusch, W. V. T.: 1969, Science 166, 596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, W. C.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, M. K. and Fisher, R. R.: 1970, Solar Phys. 14, 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modisette, J. L.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Y.: 1971, this volume, p. 25.Google Scholar
Ness, N. F. and Wilcox, J. M.: 1965, Science 152, 161.Google Scholar
Ness, N. F. and Wilcox, J. M.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 143, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, G. Jr.: 1967, Ann. Rev. Astrophys. J. 5, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, G. Jr.: 1970, in Macris, (ed.), Physics of the Solar Corona , NATO Advanced Study Institute on Physics of the Solar Corona, Greece.Google Scholar
Newkirk, G. Jr., Altschuler, M. D., and Harvey, J.: 1968, in Kiepenheuer, K. O. (ed.), ‘Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions’, IAU Symp. 35, 379.Google Scholar
Newkirk, G. Jr. and Altschuler, M. D.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, G. Jr. and Harvey, J. W.: 1968, Solar Phys. 3, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, G. Jr., Schmahl, E. J., and Deupree, R. G.: 1970, Solar Phys. 15, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pneuman, G. W.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 145, 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pneuman, G. W.: 1968, Solar Phys. 3, 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pneuman, G. W.: 1969, Solar Phys. 6, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pneuman, G. W.: 1971, Solar Phys. , in press.Google Scholar
Pneuman, G. W. and Kopp, Roger: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaty, R. and Lingenfelter, R. E.: 1968, Solar Phys. 5, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, A. C.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rust, D.: 1966, , Department of Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Rust, D. M. and Roy, J.-R.: 1971, this volume, p. 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K.: 1965, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 17, 1.Google Scholar
Sawyer, C.: 1968, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 6, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatten, K. H.: 1968, Nature 220, 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scahtten, K. H.: 1970a, Nature 226, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatten, K. H.: 1970b, Solar Phys. 12, 484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatten, K. H., Wilcox, J. M., and Ness, N. F.: 1969, Solar Phys. 6, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, H. U.: 1964, in NASA Symposium on Physics of Solar Flares , p. 107.Google Scholar
Severny, A., Wilcox, J. M., Scherrer, P. H., and Colburn, D. S.: 1970, Univ. Calif, Berkeley, Preprint Series 11, Issue 36.Google Scholar
Severny, A. and Zirin, H.: 1961, Observatory 81, 155.Google Scholar
Smerd, S. F. and Dulk, G. A.: 1971, this volume, p. 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Störmer, K.: 1911, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 152, 425.Google Scholar
Švestka, Z.: 1968, Solar Phys. 4, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takakura, T.: 1966, Space Sci. Rev. 5, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tandberg-Hanssen, E.: 1971, this volume, p. 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiessen, G.: 1952, Z. Astrophys. 30, 185.Google Scholar
Valdez, J. and Altschuler, M. D.: 1970, Solar Phys. 15, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanHoven, Gerard, Sturrock, P. A., and Switzer, Paul: 1969, AAS Meeting, Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
Veeder, G. J. and Zirin, H.: 1970, Solar Phys. 12, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Klüber, H.: 1951, Observatory 71, 9.Google Scholar
Waldmeier, M.: 1955, Z. Astrophys. 38, 37.Google Scholar
Warwick, C. S.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. J. and Davis, L. Jr.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 148, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, J. M. and Howard, R.: 1968, Solar Phys. 5, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, J. M. and Howard, R.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, J. M., Schatten, K. H., Tanenbaum, A., and Howard, R.: 1970, Univ. Calif. Berkeley, Preprint Series 11, Issue 22.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. M., Severny, A., and Colburn, D. S.: 1969, Nature 224, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, J. P.: 1969a, Proc. Astron. Soc. Austral. 1, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, J. P.: 1969b, Solar Phys. 9, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, J. P.: 1970, Proc. Astron. Soc. Austral. 1, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar