Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:55:25.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the Magnetic Field Preserved During Core Formation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2016

Brenda C. Matthews
Affiliation:
University of California at Berkeley, Radio Astronomy Laboratory, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, U.S.A.
Shih-Ping Lai
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Department of Astronomy, College Park, MD, 20742, U.S.A.
Richard M. Crutcher
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Astronomy, 1002 West Green Street, Urbana, IL, 61801, U.S.A.
Christine D. Wilson
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M1, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present recent JCMT and BIMA array polarimetry data of nearby star-forming regions in order to compare the core and cloud-scale magnetic field geometries in two regions of Orion. The similarity of the magnetic field geometry in these cores to that of their ambient clouds is contrasted with JCMT data toward the Barnard 1 dark cloud in Perseus, which reveal a different magnetic field orientation between the majority of the cores and the surrounding cloud; each of the cores exhibits a different mean polarization position angle. We conclude that the preservation of the magnetic field geometry is better in cores formed within clouds with ordered large scale structures. In Barnard 1, the cores may quickly exhibit a different polarization pattern if they have, for example, rotation which differs from the large scale cloud motions, or a weaker component of ordered fields. This could also explain why the cores exhibit such different geometries from each other in Barnard 1.

Type
Part 2: From Molecular Clouds to Protostellar Cores
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Bachiller, R., Menten, K., & del Rio-Alvarez, S. 1990, A&A, 236,461 Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S., & Fermi, E. 1953, ApJ, 118, 113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiege, J., & Pudritz, R. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 105 Google Scholar
Greaves, J. et al. 2003 MNRAS, 340, 353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, S.-P., Crutcher, R., Girart, J., & Rao, R. 2002, ApJ, 566, 925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, B., & Wilson, C. 2002, ApJ, 574, 822 Google Scholar
Matthews, B., Fiege, J., & Moriarty-Schieven, G. 2002, ApJ, 569, 304 Google Scholar
Matthews, B., Wilson, C., & Fiege, J. 2001, ApJ, 562, 400 Google Scholar
Ostriker, E., Stone, J., & Gammie, C. 2001, ApJ, 546, 980 Google Scholar
Weintraub, D., Goodman, A., & Akeson, R. 1999, proceedings of Protostars & Planets IV, 247 Google Scholar
Williams, J., Plambeck, R., & Heyer, M. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1025 Google Scholar