Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:43:01.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ionization State along the Beam of Herbig-Haro Jets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Francesca Bacciotti
Francesca Bacciotti*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia e Scienza dello Spazio, Università di Firenze, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An original spectroscopic diagnostic technique has been recently developed that allows to estimate in a model-independent way the ionization fraction xe and the average excitation temperature in the beam of Herbig-Haro jets (Bacciotti, Chiuderi and Oliva 1995). The procedure is based on the fact that in the low excitation conditions present in this region the ionization state of oxygen and nitrogen can be assumed to be regulated by charge exchange with atomic hydrogen. The application of this technique to long-slit spectra of several well-known stellar jets indicates that the hydrogen ionization fraction xe starts from 0.2-0.4 at the beginning of the flow and gently decreases along the whole jet or along sections of it as a result of time-dependent recombination. The average temperature stays almost constant, ranging from 4500 to 7000 K. The momentum transfer rates evaluated with the derived total number densities (nH ∼ 103–104 cm–3) give support to the picture in which the jet is responsible for the acceleration of a surrounding molecular outflow.

Type
I. Herbig-Haro Objects, H2 Flows and Radio Jets
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 182: Herbig-Haro Flows and the Birth of Low Mass Stars , 1997 , pp. 73 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997 

References

Bacciotti, F., Chiuderi, C., and Oliva, E., 1995, A&A, 296, 185 (BC095).Google Scholar
Bacciotti, F., Hirth, G. and Natta, A., 1996, A&A, 310, 309.Google Scholar
Bacciotti, F., Chiuderi, C. and Pouquet, A., 1997, Ap J, 478, 594.Google Scholar
Bacciotti, F., and Eislöffel, J., 1997, A&A, submitted (BE97).Google Scholar
Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., Ferrari, A., and Trussoni, E., 1994, A&A, 283, 655.Google Scholar
Cabrit, S., Edwards, S., Strom, S., and Strom, K., 1990, ApJ 354, 687.Google Scholar
Chernin, L., and Masson, C., 1995, ApJ, 455, 182.Google Scholar
Edwards, S., Cabrit, S., Strom, S., Heyer, I., Strom, K., and Anderson, E., 1987, ApJ 321, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eislöffel, J., and Mundt, R., 1992, A&A 263, 292.Google Scholar
Hartigan, P., Morse, J., and Raymond, J., 1994, ApJ, 436, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Königl, A., and Ruden, S.P., 1993, in Protostar and Planets III, Levy, G. and Lumine, J. eds. Tucson: University of Arizona press, 641.Google Scholar
Mundt, R., Ray, T.P., and Raga, A. C., 1991, A&A 252, 740.Google Scholar
Osterbrock, D.E., 1989, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei, University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
Raga, A.C., 1992, private communication.Google Scholar
Raga, A.C., and Kofman, L., 1992, ApJ 386, 222.Google Scholar
Ray, T.P., Mundt, R., Dyson, J.E., Falle, S.A.E.G. and Raga, A.C., 1996, ApJ, 468, L103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reipurth, B, 1989, Nature, 340, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reipurth, B., Bally, J., Graham, J.A., Lane, A.P., and Zealey, W.J., 1986, A&A 164, 51.Google Scholar
Stone, J.M., and Norman, M.L., 1993, ApJ 413, 198.Google Scholar