Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T06:40:52.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and interaction of planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Pawel Artymowicz*
Affiliation:
Stockholm Observatory, SE-13336 Saltsjöbaden, Sweden, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss theories of origin and evolution of the newly discovered extrasolar planetary systems. As these systems failed to fulfill prior expectations concerning their orbital structure, we are challenged to extend and/or revise many preexisting theories. Important extensions include migration of bodies in disks and planetary eccentricity pumping by planet-planet interaction and primordial disk-planet interaction. Progress in observational techniques will allow us to find which of these two types of interaction is responsible for the observed variety of orbits and masses of planets. New insights into the formation of giant planets in our system can be obtained by asking why Jupiter and Saturn are not larger, closer to the sun and/or do not follow noticeably elliptic orbits.

Type
Part II: Progress in the theory of planet formation
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Artymowicz, P., Clarke, C., Lubow, S.H., & Pringle, J.E. 1991, ApJ, 370, L35.Google Scholar
Artymowicz, P. 1992, PASP, 104, 769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artymowicz, P. 1993, ApJ, 419, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artymowicz, P. 1997, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 25, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artymowicz, P. & Lubow, S.H. 1996, ApJ, 467, L77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artymowicz, P., Lubow, S. H., and Kley, W. 1998, in Planetary systems - the long view, Eds. Celnikier, L. et al., Editiones Frontieres, p. 381.Google Scholar
Artymowicz, P. 2000, in Prom Extrasolar Planets to Cosmology: The VLT Opening Symposium, Eds. Bergeron, J., Renzini, A., Springer Verlag, p. 391.Google Scholar
Black, D. 1997, ApJ, 490, L171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boss, A. 1995, Science, 287, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boss, A. 2001, this volume.Google Scholar
Bryden, G., Chen, X., Lin, D.N.C., et al. 1999, ApJ, 514, 344.Google Scholar
Butler, R.P., Marcy, G. W., Vogt, S.S., Fischer, D. A. 2001, this volume.Google Scholar
Dick, S.J. 1982, Plurality of Worlds, Cambridge U. Press.Google Scholar
Duquennoy, A., & Mayor, M. 1991, A&A, 248, 485.Google Scholar
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857.Google Scholar
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241, 425.Google Scholar
Heap, S., Lindler, D., Lanz, T., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, M.J., & Wiegert, PA. 1999, AJ. 117, 621.Google Scholar
Kley, W. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 696.Google Scholar
Koerner, D. W., Ressler, M. E., Werer, M. W., Backman, D. E. 1998, ApJ, 503, L83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrange, A-M., Backman, D., & Artymowicz, P. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V. et al. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 703.Google Scholar
Laughlin, G., & Adams, F. 1999, ApJ, 508, L171.Google Scholar
Laughlin, G., & Bodenheimer, P. 1994, ApJ, 436, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levison, H.F., Lissauer, J.J., & Duncan, M.J. 1998, AJ, 116, 1998.Google Scholar
Lin, D.N.C., & Papaloizou, J.C.B. 1979, MNRAS, 186, 799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, D.N.C., & Papaloizou, J.C.B. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, eds. Levy, E.H. and Lunine, J.I. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 749.Google Scholar
Lin, D.N.C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D.C. 1996, Nature, 380, 606.Google Scholar
Lissauer, J.J. 2001, Nature, 409, 23.Google Scholar
Lubow, S.H., & Artymowicz, P. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V. et al. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 731.Google Scholar
Lubow, S.H., Seibert, M., & Artymowicz, P. 1999, ApJ, 526, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannings, V., Boss, A. & Russell, S. (eds.), 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), p. 1400.Google Scholar
Marcy, G., et al. 2001, www.exoplanets.org.Google Scholar
Mathieu, R. D. 1994, ARA&A, 32, 465.Google Scholar
Mathieu, R. D., Ghez, A. M., Jensen, E.L.N., & Simon, M. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V. et al. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 703.Google Scholar
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A. 2000, ApJ, 537, L65.Google Scholar
Owen, T., & Bar-Nun, A. 1995, Icarus, 116, 215.Google Scholar
Owen, T., Mahaffy, P., Niemann, H.B., Atreya, S., et al. 1999, Nature, 402, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaloizou, J.C.B., Nelson, R.P. & Masset, F. 2001, A&A, 366, 263.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, T., & Artymowicz, P. 2001, ApJ, in print.Google Scholar
Ward, W.R. 1997, ApJ, 482, L211.Google Scholar
Weidenschilling, S.J., Marzari, F. 1996, Nature, 384, 619.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A. J., Becklin, E. E., Schneider, G., Smith, , et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, L53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolszczan, A., Frail, D.A. 1992, Nature, 355, 145.Google Scholar