Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T20:01:59.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Gravitational Lens” 3C 321: A Remarkable Impostor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Alexei V. Filippenko
Alexei V. Filippenko*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent observations of the radio galaxy 3C 321 are presented. The optical nucleus consists of two components (A, B), separated by ∼ 4″ (∼ 6 kpc), whose low-resolution spectra strongly resemble those of high-ionization type 2 Seyfert nuclei. The relative intensities of the emission lines differ in A and B by less than 1%, and their profiles are almost identical. 3C 321 appears to be a convincing example of a gravitationally lensed object.

Careful analysis of high-quality radio and optical data, however, reveals that the system is almost certainly not a lens. The equivalent widths of the emission lines are roughly twice as high in B than in A, and there are significant spatial offsets between regions of bright continuum and line emission. A slight, but fundamental, difference is visible in the two Hα emission profiles. The radial velocities of A and B are discrepant by 31 ± 10 km s−1. Finally, component A is nearly coincident with a flat-spectrum radio core, whereas B is next to an extended, steep-spectrum knot of radio emission.

This object should serve as a warning to lens hunters: beware of impostors, whose true properties may be difficult to ascertain without extensive optical and radio observations.

Type
Chapter XIII: Gravitational Lenses
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 124: Observational Cosmology , 1987 , pp. 761 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Canizares, C. R. 1987, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-S., and Shaver, P. A. 1982, ESO Messenger, 30, 2.Google Scholar
Filippenko, A. V., and Sargent, W. L. W. 1985, Ap. J. Suppl., 57, 503.Google Scholar
Graham, J. A., and Price, R. M. 1981, Ap. J., 247, 813.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. P., Marshall, H. L., and Oke, J. B. 1984, A. J., 89, 1802.Google Scholar
He, X.-T. 1987, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Kayser, R., Refsdal, S., and Stabell, R. 1986, Astr. Ap., 166, 36.Google Scholar
Kayser, R., Refsdal, S., and Stabell, R., and Grieger, S. 1987, these proceedings.Google Scholar
van Breugel, W. J. M. 1986, in Proc. Toronto Conference on Jets from Stars and Galaxies , ed. Henriksen, R. N. and Jones, T. W. (Canadian Journal of Physics, 64), p. 392.Google Scholar
van Breugel, W. J. M., Filippenko, A. V., Heckman, T. M., and Miley, G. K. 1985, Ap. J., 293, 83.Google Scholar
van Breugel, W. J. M., Filippenko, A. V., McCarthy, P. J., Heckman, T. M., Miller, J. S., and Miley, G. K. 1987, A. J., submitted.Google Scholar