Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:07:04.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Galaxies at Intermediate Redshifts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

Richard S. Ellis
Richard S. Ellis*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Durham University Durham DH1 3LE, England

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Faint object spectroscopy and deep infrared imaging is providing exciting opportunities to understand the astrophysical nature of normal galaxies up to ≃8-10 Gyr ago (Ho=50). Deep photometry of 10 distant clusters with 0.5< z <1 shows a systematic bluing of red members with look-back time, in good agreement with the view that the bulk of the early type population must be genuinely old (zf >2) and remarkably homogeneous. Statistically complete redshift surveys of the highly abundant population of faint blue field galaxies, however, indicate sizeable changes must have occurred in the galaxy luminosity functions as recently as z≃0.5. Possible explanations include widespread merging of star-forming sub-units of present day galaxies, or an entirely new population of sources whose present-day remnants are intrinsically faint. The contrast between the long term evolution of the spheroidal population and that seen in the faint counts is striking. I finally discuss some new opportunities to identifying field galaxies with z>l using gravitational lensing and QSO absorber identifications.

Type
III. The Stellar Populations of Non-Resolved Galaxies
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 149: The Stellar populations of Galaxies , 1992 , pp. 297 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 

References

Aaronson, M, Persson, S E & Frogel, J A 1981 Ap. J. , 245, 18.Google Scholar
Aragón-Salamanca, A 1991, , .Google Scholar
Aragón-Salamanca, A, Ellis, R S & Sharples, R M 1991, MNRAS , 248, 128.Google Scholar
Babul, A & Rees, M J 1991, preprint.Google Scholar
Bergeron, J & Boissé, P 1991 Astron. Astr. , 243, 344.Google Scholar
Bower, R G, Ellis, R S, Rose, J & Sharples, R M 1991, Astr. J. , 99, 530.Google Scholar
Bower, R G, Lucey, J R & Ellis, R S 1991 MNRAS , in press.Google Scholar
Broadhurst, T J, Ellis, R S & Shanks, T 1988 MNRAS , 235, 827.Google Scholar
Broadhurst, T J, Ellis, R S & Glazebrook, K 1991 Nature in press.Google Scholar
Bruzual, G 1983 Ap. J. , 273, 105.Google Scholar
Bruzual, G 1984 in Evolution of Galaxies , ed. Gondhalekhar, P, RAL Publications, RAL 84-003.Google Scholar
Burstein, D, Bertola, F, Buson, L M, Faber, S M & Lauer, T Ap. J. , 328, 440.Google Scholar
Butcher, H & Oemler, A 1978 Ap. J. , 219, 18.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, A 1989 Ap. J. Suppl. , 71, 817.Google Scholar
Colless, M M, Ellis, R S, Taylor, K & Hook, R N 1990 MNRAS , 244, 408.Google Scholar
Colless, M M, Ellis, R S, Broadhurst, T J, Taylor, K & Peterson, B A 1991, in preparation.Google Scholar
Couch, W J & Sharples, R M 1988 MNRAS , 299, 423.Google Scholar
Couch, W J, Ellis, R S, Malin, D F & MacLaren, I 1991 MNRAS , 249, 606.Google Scholar
Cowie, L L in The Post-Recombination Universe , ed. Kaiser, N & Lasenby, A, Kluwer, p1.Google Scholar
Cowie, L L 1991 in Observational Tests of Cosmological Inflation , eds. Shanks, T et al, Kluwer, p25.Google Scholar
Cowie, L L & Lilly, S J 1990 in Evolution in the Universe of Galaxies: Hubble Centennial Symposium , ASP Conference Series, ed. Kron, R, p212.Google Scholar
Cowie, L L, Gardner, J P, Hu, E M, Wainscoat, R J & Hodapp, K W 1991a Ap. J. , in press.Google Scholar
Cowie, L L, Songaila, A & Hu, E 1991b Nature , submitted.Google Scholar
Dressler, A 1984 Ann. Rev. Ast. Astr. , 22, 185.Google Scholar
Dressler, A & Gunn, J E 1983 Ap. J. , 263, 533.Google Scholar
Dressler, A & Gunn, J E 1990 in Evolution in the Universe of Galaxies: Hubble Centennial Symposium , ASP Conference Series, ed. Kron, R, p200.Google Scholar
Ellis, R S 1990 in Evolution in the Universe of Galaxies: Hubble Centennial Symposium , ASP Conference Series, ed. Kron, R, p248.Google Scholar
Ellis, R S, Couch, W J, MacLaren, I & Koo, D C 1985 MNRAS , 217, 239.Google Scholar
Frenk, C S, White, S D M, Efstathiou, G & Davis, M 1990 Ap. J. , 351, 10.Google Scholar
Greggio, L & Renzini, A 1990 Ap. J. , 364, 35.Google Scholar
Guhathakurta, P, Tyson, A J & Majewski, S 1991 Ap. J. , 357, L9.Google Scholar
Gunn, J E, Hoessel, J & Oke, J B 1986 Ap. J. , 306, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, D C 1990, in Evolution in the Universe of Galaxies: Hubble Centennial Symposium , ASP Conference Series, ed. Kron, R, p268.Google Scholar
MacLaren, I, Ellis, R S & Couch, W J 1989 MNRAS. , 230, 249.Google Scholar
O'Connell, R W 1980 Ap. J. , 236, 340.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J P 1990 in Evolution in the Universe of Galaxies: Hubble Centennial Symposium , ASP Conference Series, ed. Kron, R, p25.Google Scholar
Pickles, A J 1985 Ap. J. , 296, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J 1985 Astr. J. , 90, 1927.Google Scholar
Rose, J, Bower, R G, Ellis, R S, Sharples, R M, Caldwell, N M & Teague, P 1991, in preparation.Google Scholar
Sandage, A & Visvanathan, N 1977 Ap. J. , 216, 214.Google Scholar
Saunders, W, Rowan-Robinson, M, Lawrence, A, Efstathiou, G P, Kaiser, N, Ellis, R S & Frenk, C S 1990 MNRAS , 242, 318.Google Scholar
Soifer, B T, Sanders, D B, Neugebauer, G, Danielson, G E, Lonsdale, C J, Madore, B F & Persson, S E 1986 Ap. J. , 303, L41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soucail, G, Mellier, Y, Fort, B, Matthex, G & Cailloux, M 1988 Astron. Astr. , 191, L19.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B M 1977 Ap. J. , 211, 621 (erratum 216, 349).Google Scholar
Tyson, A J 1988 Astr. J. , 96, 1.Google Scholar
Yoshii, Y & Takahara, F 1988 Ap. J. , 326, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar