Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:37:48.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Galactic Dynamics and Magnetic Field Amplification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Harald Lesch*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, W-5300 Bonn 1, FRG

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stimulated by recent high frequency radio polarization measurements of M83 and M51, we consider the influence of non-axisymmetric features (bars, spiral arms, etc…) on galactic magnetic fields. The time scale for the field amplification due to the non-axisymmetric velocity field is related to the time scale of angular momentum transport in the disk by the non-axisymmetric features. Due to its dissipational character (cooling and angular momentum transport) the gas plays a major role for the excitation of non-axisymmetric instabilities. Since it is the gaseous component of the interstellar gas in which magnetic field amplification takes place we consider the interplay of gasdynamical processes triggered by gravitational instabilities and magnetic fields. A comparison with the time scale for dynamo action in a disk from numerical models for disk dynamos gives the result that field amplification by non-axisymmetric features is faster in galaxies like M83 (strong bar) and M51 (compagnion and very distinct spiral structure), than amplification by an axisymmetric dynamo. Furthermore, we propose that axisymmetric gravitational instabilities may provide the turbulent magnetic diffusivity ηT. Based on standard galaxy models we obtain a radially dependent diffusivity whose numerical value rises from 1025cm 2s −1 to 1027cm 2s −1, declining for large radii.

Type
9. Magnetohydrodynamic Phenomena in the Interstellar Medium Related to Dynamo Processes
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1993 

References

Athanassoula, E.: 1984, Phys. Rep. 114, 321 Google Scholar
Camenzind, M., Lesch, H.: 1992, AA (in press) Google Scholar
Goldreich, P., Lynden-Bell, D.: 1965, MNRAS 130, 125 Google Scholar
Julian, W.H., Toomre, A.: ApJ 146, 810 Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R.C.:1989, ApJ 344, 685 Google Scholar
Larson, R.B.: 1984, MNRAS 206, 197 Google Scholar
Lin, C.C., Shu, F.H.: 1964, ApJ 140, 646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.C., Shu, F.H.: 1966, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 55, 229 Google Scholar
Lin, D.N.C., Pringle, J.E.: 1987, MNRAS 225, 607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubow, S.H., Balbus, S.A., Cowie, L.L.: 1986, ApJ 309, 496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., Kalnajs, A.J.: 1972, MNRAS 157, 1 Google Scholar
Neininger, N.: 1992, AA 263, 30 Google Scholar
Neininger, N., Klein, U., Beck, R., Wielebinski, R.: 1991, Nature 352, 781 Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P, Peebles, P.J.E.: 1973, ApJ 186, 467 Google Scholar
Ruzmaikin, A.A., Shukurov, A.M., Sokoloff, D.D.: 1988, Magnetic Fields of Galaxies , Reidel, Dordrecht Google Scholar
Sellwood, J.A., Carlberg, R.G.: 1984, ApJ 282, 61 Google Scholar
Thomasson, M., Donner, K.J., Elmegreen, B.G.: 1991, AA 250, 316 Google Scholar
Toomre, A.: 1964, ApJ 139, 1217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar