Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:10:15.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Formation of Compact Objects in Binary Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

E.P.J. van den Heuvel
E.P.J. van den Heuvel*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The various ways in which compact objects (neutron stars and black holes) can be formed in interacting binary systems are qualitatively outlined on the basis of the three major modes of binary interaction identified by Webbink (1980). Massive interacting binary systems (M1 ≳ 10–12 M⊙) are, after the first phase of mass transfer expected to leave as remnants:

(i) compact stars in massive binary systems (mass ≳ 10 M⊙) with a wide range of orbital periods, as remnants of quasi-conservative mass transfer; these systems later evolve into massive X-ray binaries.

(ii) short-period compact star binaries (P ~ 1–2 days) in which the companion may be more massive or less massive than the compact object; these systems have high runaway velocities (≳ 100 km/sec) and start out with highly eccentric orbits, which are rapidly circularized by tidal forces; they may later evolve into low-mass X-ray binaries;

(iii) single runaway compact objects with space velocities of ~ 102 to 4.102 km/sec; these are expected to be the most numerous compact remnants.

Compact star binaries may also form from Cataclysmic binaries or wide binaries in which an O-Ne-Mg white dwarf is driven over the Chandrasekhar limit by accretion.

Type
Session 4: Mass Exchange on Close Binary Stars and the Effect on Stellar Evolution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 93: Fundamental Problems in the Theory of Stellar Evolution , 1981 , pp. 155 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1981 

References

Abt, H.A. and Levy, S.G. 1978, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 36, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, W.D. 1978, in: “Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars and Black Holes” (Giacconi, R. and Ruffini, R., eds.), North Holl. Publ. Comp., Amsterdam, p. 356.Google Scholar
Blandford, R. 1980, I.A.U. Symp. Nr. 95, “Pulsars” (Sieber, W. and Wiebelinski, R., eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht (in press) Google Scholar
Bond, H.E., Liller, W. and Mannery, E.J. 1978, Astrophys. J. 223, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradt, H.V., Doxsey, R.E. and Jernigan, J.G. 1978, “Positions and Identifications of Gal. X-ray Sources”, MIT preprint CSR-P-78-54, also in: “Advances in Space Exploration, vol. 3 (1979)”.Google Scholar
Chechetkin, V.M., Gershtein, S.S., Imshennik, V.S., Ivanova, L.N. and Khlopov, M. Yu. 1980, Astrophys. Space Sc. 67, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, P.S. 1978, Astron Astrophys, 63, 225.Google Scholar
Cowley, A.P. 1980, Proc. NATO Adv. Study Inst. “Compact Galactic X-ray Sources,” (Sanford, P., ed.) Cambridge Univ. Press (in press).Google Scholar
Crampton, D., Cowley, A.P. and Hutchings, J.B. 1980, Astrophys. J. 235, L. 131.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. and Ostriker, J.P. 1973, Astrophys. J. 179, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, J.P. 1980, in: “Fundamental Problems in Stellar Evolution” (Sugimoto, D. et al., eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht this volume, p. 184.Google Scholar
De Greve, J.P., De Loore, C. and van Dessel, Ed. 1978, Astrophys. Sp. Sc. 53, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, A. 1979, in: “Mass Loss and Evol. of O-type stars” (Conti, P. S. and De Loore, C., eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 415.Google Scholar
Delgado, A. and Thomas, H.-C. 1980, preprint Max Planck Institut für Astrophys. Garching b. München.Google Scholar
De Loore, C. and De Greve, J.P. 1976, in: “Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems” (Eggleton, P. et al., eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 193.Google Scholar
Flannery, B.P. and Ulrich, R.K. 1977, Astrophys. J. 212, 533.Google Scholar
Fowler, L.A. 1980, (private communication).Google Scholar
Fryxell, B.A. and Arnett, W.D. 1978, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 10, 448.Google Scholar
Gursky, H. 1976, in: “ Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems” (Eggleton, P. et al. eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht. p. 19.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1975, Astrophys. J. 198, L. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1976, in: “Structure and Evol. of Close Binary systems” (Eggleton, P. et al., eds.), Reidel, Dordecht,p.35.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1977, Annals N.Y. Acad. Sciences 302, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1978, in: “Physics and Astrophys. of Neutron Stars and Black Holes”, Giacconi, R. and Ruffini, R. (editors), North. Holl. Publ. Co. Amsterdam, p. 828.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1980, in “X-Ray Astronomy” (Giaconni, R. and Setti, G., eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 115.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. and Heise, J. 1972, Nature Phys. Sc. 239, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. and De Loore, C. 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 25, 387.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J.B., Crampton, D., and Cowley, A.P. 1978, Astrophys. J. 225, 548.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J.B. 1980, in: “Proc. NATO Adv. Study Inst. on Compact Gal. X-ray Sources” (Sanford, P., ed.) Cambridge Univ. Press (in press).Google Scholar
Joss, P.C. and Rappaport, S. 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 71, 217.Google Scholar
Kelley, R., Rappaport, S. and Petre, R. 1979, Astrophys. J. (in press).Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R. and Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 54, 539.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R. and Weigert, A. 1967, Zeits. Ap. 65, 251.Google Scholar
Lewin, W.H.G. and Clark, G.W. 1980, in: “Proc. 9th Texas Symp.on Relativ. Astrophys. Ann. New. Y. Acad. Sc. 336, 451.Google Scholar
Li, F., Rappaport, S., Joss, P.C., McClintock, J.E. and Wright, E. 1980, Astrophys. J. (Lett.), in press.Google Scholar
Manchester, R.N., Newton, L.M., Cooke, D.J. and Lyne, A.G. 1980, Astrophys. J. 236, L 25.Google Scholar
Massey, P. and Conti, P.S. 1980, Astrophys. J. (in press).Google Scholar
Mc Cray, R. 1979, (priv. communication).Google Scholar
Meyer, F. and Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 78, 167.Google Scholar
Middleditch, J., Mason, K.O., Nelson, J. and White, N. 1980, preprint Google Scholar
Miyaji, S., Nomoto, K., Yokoi, K. and Sugimoto, D. 1980, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 32, 303.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. 1980, Proc. Workshop on “Type I supernovae”, Univ. of Austin, Texas (in press).Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. 1976, in: IAU Symp. 73 “Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems” (Eggleton, P. et al., eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. and Zytkov, A. 1980, In preparation.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1971a, Ann. Review Astron. Astrophys. 9, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1971b, Acta Astronomica 21, 1.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1976, in: IAU Symp. 73 “Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems” (Eggleton, P. et al., eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, p 75.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1980, Acta Astronomica (in press).Google Scholar
van Paradijs, J. 1978, Nature 274, 650.Google Scholar
van Paradijs, J. 1980, I.A.U. Circ. No. 3487 (19 june).Google Scholar
Plavec, M. 1968, Advances Astron. Astrophys. 6, 201.Google Scholar
Ritter, H. 1976, Mon. Notices Roy. Astr. Soc. 175, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, H. 1980, ESO Messenger (in press), ESO, Garching b. München.Google Scholar
Savonije, G.J. 1978 1, Astron. Astrophys. 62, 317.Google Scholar
Savonije, G.J. 1978 2, , Univ. of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Savonije, G.J. 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 71, 352.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D.A. et al., 1979, Preprint Center for Astrophys. (Harvard Univ.).Google Scholar
Shakura, N.I. and Sunyaev, R.A. 1973, Astron Astrophys 24, 337.Google Scholar
Smarr, L. L. and Blandford, R. 1976, Astrophys. J. 207, 574.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, D., and Nomoto, K. 1980, Space Sc. Reviews, 25, 155.Google Scholar
Sutantyo, W. 1974, Astron. Astrophys. 31, 339.Google Scholar
Sutantyo, W. 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 35, 251.Google Scholar
Taam, R.E. 1979, Astrophys. Letters 20, 29.Google Scholar
Taam, R.E. Bodenheimer, P. and Ostriker, J.P. 1979, Astrophys. J. 222, 269.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H. 1980, (priv. communication).Google Scholar
Taylor, J. H., Hulse, R.A., Fowler, L.A., Gullahorn, G.E. and Rankin, J.M. 1976, Astrophys. J. 206, L 53.Google Scholar
Thomas, H.-C. 1977, Annual Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 15, 127.Google Scholar
Trimble, V. 1974, Astron. J. 79, 967.Google Scholar
Tutukov, A.V. and Yungelson, L.R. 1973, Nautsnie Inform, 27, 58.Google Scholar
Tutukov, A.V. and Yungelson, L.R. 1980, “Close Binary Stars” (editors: Plavec, M. et al.) Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 15.Google Scholar
Warner, B. 1974, Mon. N. Roy. Astr. Soc. 167, 61 p.Google Scholar
Webbink, R.F., 1980, in: I.A.U. Colloq. Nr. 53, “White Dwarfs and Variable Degenerate Stars”, Reidel, Dordrecht Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.C., Mc Kee, C.F. and Lecar, M. 1975 Astrophys. J. 200, 145.Google Scholar
Whelan, J. and Iben, I. 1973, Astrophys. J. 186, 1007.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. 1976, in: “ Structure and Evol. of Close Binary Systems” (Eggleton, P. et al., eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. 1977, Annuals N.Y. Acad. Sci. 302, 47.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. and Paczynski, B. 1980, Acta Astronomica (in press).Google Scholar